QuILT-rules - Laptörténet

Pitlik, 2018. november 24., 10:10-n

2018-11-24T10:10:37Z

Pitlik, 2018. november 24., 09:52-n

2018-11-24T09:52:45Z

Pitlik, 2018. november 23., 12:53-n

2018-11-23T12:53:04Z

Pitlik, 2018. november 20., 10:33-n

2018-11-20T10:33:30Z

Pitlik: Új oldal, tartalma: „Terms and conditions (offered by teachers, revisions by Students - s also the history behind and the discussions parallel): *...”

2018-11-19T11:57:35Z

Új oldal, tartalma: „Terms and conditions (offered by teachers, revisions by Students - s also the history behind and the discussions parallel): *...”

Új lap

Terms and conditions (offered by teachers, revisions by Students - s also the history behind and the discussions parallel):
*...

← Régebbi változat		A lap 2018. november 24., 10:10-kori változata
22. sor:		22. sor:

	The list above is also a kind of magic of words - because each word, each sentence can be interpreted quasi in arbitrary ways. Ethical hackers are experts being capable of highlighting the potential of parallel interpretations. Everybody can become an ethical hacker. Each comments and questions concerning the above listed offers for common rules are elements of a process of ethical hacker activities.		The list above is also a kind of magic of words - because each word, each sentence can be interpreted quasi in arbitrary ways. Ethical hackers are experts being capable of highlighting the potential of parallel interpretations. Everybody can become an ethical hacker. Each comments and questions concerning the above listed offers for common rules are elements of a process of ethical hacker activities.
		+
		+	Everybody may offer new description layers and/or fine tune the above mentioned initial interpretations!

@@ 1. sor: / 1. sor: @@
- QuILT-sitemap: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/QuILT-content
+  QuILT-sitemap: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/QuILT-content
 Terms and conditions (offered by teachers, revisions by Students - s also the history behind and the discussions parallel):
-*All sources (Internet, books, persons) can always be involved into the problem solving by Students.
+*All sources (like Internet, books, persons, etc.) can always be involved into the problem solving by Students.
-*No data/fact should be learned (in the classic way - But: the problem solving is mostly faster, if a big data asset is available in the brain of Students.)
+*No data/fact should be learned (in the classic way - but: the problem solving is mostly faster, if a rel. big data asset is available in the brain of the Students.)
 *Good questions can not be answered through simple Google searches.
-*Knowledge is, what can be transformed into source code, each other human activity is a kind of artistic activity.
+*Questions, which can be answered through simple searches are queries (concerning more or less structured databases).
-*Students should not only be capable of reflecting the already well-known “knowledge” from the past, but they have to find problems, lacks, risks in the structure of the given net of facts and rules. Therefore: Students should become a better expert as their classic teachers.
+*Knowledge is, what can be transformed into source code, each other human activity is a kind of artistic activity (cf. Motto from Knuth).
-*A relevant question is: what is better than an other object?
+*Students should not only be capable of reflecting the already well-known “knowledge” from the past, but they have to find problems, lacks, risks, forms of inconsistency in the structure of the given net of facts and rules. Therefore: Students should become a better expert as their classic teachers.
-*The real role of the “teachers” is the role of the coaches.
+*A relevant question (what can not be answered through a trivial search process) is: what is better than an other object, where object can be an arbitrary phenomenon (like persons, subjects, processes, time-windows, regions, etc.).
-*The learning/teaching/coaching processes should be as far as possible to produce log-data (e.g. questions and answers should always be collected in a written form).
+*The real role of the “teachers” is the role of a coaches.
-*The magic of words is not the final form of the description of knowledge.
+*The learning/teaching/coaching processes should be as far as possible to produce log-data (e.g. questions and answers from each participants of the processes should always be collected in a written form).
-*It worth knowing about the Academic Writing Skills as far as possible (especially in cases, where relevant messages should be created in form of SMS.)
+*The magic of words is not the final form of the description of knowledge, where quasi the whole written sources are element of the magic of words because the human words/terms are not to define in an arbitrary exactness.
-*The log-based evaluations of performances of the Students will always be public in an anonimyzed way (see: PLA-phase, mid-term dashboards, final evaluation).
+*It worth knowing about the Academic Writing Skills as far as possible (especially in cases, where relevant messages of a study should be created in form of an SMS - e.g. for the introduction, elements of the literature, conclusion, etc.).
-*Performances should be benchmarked/compared as far as possible.
+*The log-based evaluations of performances of the Students will always be public in a way ensuring anonimity (see: PLA-phase, mid-term dashboards, final evaluation).
-*Evaluations should be derived about performances not only by the coaches, but especially by Students about at least 3 further Students.
+*Performances should be compared to each other as far as possible (c.f. benchmarking).
-*Questions should be answered as far as possible in the first case by Students.
+*Evaluations of Students should be derived about his/her performances not only by the coaches, but especially by about at least 3 further Students.
-*Unprepared declarations from coaches/literature without trial & error effects by Students are to minimize.
+*Each Question should be answered as far as possible in the first case by Students and just later by teachers.

← Régebbi változat		A lap 2018. november 23., 12:53-kori változata
2. sor:		2. sor:

	Terms and conditions (offered by teachers, revisions by Students - s also the history behind and the discussions parallel):		Terms and conditions (offered by teachers, revisions by Students - s also the history behind and the discussions parallel):
−	*...	+
		+	*All sources (Internet, books, persons) can always be involved into the problem solving by Students.
		+	*No data/fact should be learned (in the classic way - But: the problem solving is mostly faster, if a big data asset is available in the brain of Students.)
		+	*Good questions can not be answered through simple Google searches.
		+	*Knowledge is, what can be transformed into source code, each other human activity is a kind of artistic activity.
		+	*Students should not only be capable of reflecting the already well-known “knowledge” from the past, but they have to find problems, lacks, risks in the structure of the given net of facts and rules. Therefore: Students should become a better expert as their classic teachers.
		+	*A relevant question is: what is better than an other object?
		+	*The real role of the “teachers” is the role of the coaches.
		+	*The learning/teaching/coaching processes should be as far as possible to produce log-data (e.g. questions and answers should always be collected in a written form).
		+	*The magic of words is not the final form of the description of knowledge.
		+	*It worth knowing about the Academic Writing Skills as far as possible (especially in cases, where relevant messages should be created in form of SMS.)
		+	*The log-based evaluations of performances of the Students will always be public in an anonimyzed way (see: PLA-phase, mid-term dashboards, final evaluation).
		+	*Performances should be benchmarked/compared as far as possible.
		+	*Evaluations should be derived about performances not only by the coaches, but especially by Students about at least 3 further Students.
		+	*Questions should be answered as far as possible in the first case by Students.
		+	*Unprepared declarations from coaches/literature without trial & error effects by Students are to minimize.

← Régebbi változat		A lap 2018. november 20., 10:33-kori változata
1. sor:		1. sor:
		+	QuILT-sitemap: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/QuILT-content
		+
	Terms and conditions (offered by teachers, revisions by Students - s also the history behind and the discussions parallel):		Terms and conditions (offered by teachers, revisions by Students - s also the history behind and the discussions parallel):
	*...		*...