QuILT-critical-demo

A Miau Wiki wikiből
A lap korábbi változatát látod, amilyen Pitlik (vitalap | szerkesztései) 2018. november 24., 11:26-kor történt szerkesztése után volt.

(eltér) ← Régebbi változat | legfrissebb változat (eltér) | Újabb változat→ (eltér)
QuILT-sitemap: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/QuILT-content

Questions/interpretations from ideal Students:

Answers from teachers:
  • What does it mean: ars virtualica and/or in medias res?
    • Argumentation: in a trailer, it is maybe not productive enough to confront users with problematic solutions...
    • Alternative solution: Be more "dirty" - like Deep and dirty truths?!
      • Argumentation: Eye-catchers are relevant to support focusing...
      • Critical comments / chained communication from other Students (later see history of articles):
        • The education scenarios should have a more qualitative level of communication contrary to e.g. fake news portals...
        • The ancient effects make the horizon of Students wider...
        • Intercultural bridges can only be constructed, if cultural elements will be presented in a direct way...
Ars virtualica: it means (c.f. ars poetica - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_Poetica) principles in the virtual reality like QuILT-WIKI...
In medias res: it means (c.f. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_medias_res) "into the middle of things" - because the complexity is so high, that it is not relevant, where the starting point is)...
Dirty communication: it could be made a sub-cultural contract about the grade of tolerated dirtiness between the affected persons in a closed system, but this QuILT-WIKI is an open sub-system within the MIAU-WIKI services...
Inter/trans/multicultural aspects: GOOD IDEA! The first QuILT-performances are written in Europe/in Hungary - but everybody can try to find analogies from other cultures for each position having a robust European/Hungarian character....

  • Why seems to be important to use the specific, above mentioned phrases?
    • Argumentation: Special effects can disturb the effectiveness/efficiency of learning...
    • Alternative solution: Written form needs no special effects...
      • Argumentation: Without a human presence, effects are not necessary...
      • Critical comments / chained communication from other Students (later see history of articles):
        • Effect-less (written) communication can also be disturbing (c.f. novels)...
        • It seems to be, that a given solution in QuILT can be evaluated both extreme negative and extreme positive...
Meta-level approximation over the extremities: GOOD IDEA! The QuILT-performances need a specific role - the role of the narrator/a wise man/the judge...

Everybody may offer new description layers and/or fine tune the above mentioned initial interpretations!