+ IBF (Idea-breeding-farm) +

We are proud of this study! close

+ MY-X DVD +

2017.IX.
Young members of the MY-X team co-operate successfully with PhD-Students in frame of the conference of Szarvas!

2017.VII.
The MY-X team (incl. joung members) participated on the conference 'In memoriam Enyedi György'

2017.VI.
Bárdy-Péter-Prize for a member of the MY-X team concerning his innovation potential!

2017.V.
Gábor-Dénes-Prize (special prize for mathematics) for a member of the MY-X team!

2017.IV.
Special Prize in Minsk in frame of an essay-competition for a member of the MY-X team concerning a study about reform approches in education!

2017.IV.
III. Prize in the Hlavay competition for a member of the MY-X team!

2017.III.
NTP-NFTÖ financial support for a member of the MY-X team!

2017.II.
Successful presentation in TUDOK-competition in Nyíregyháza and later in Székesfehérvár by a member of the MY-X team!



Last modified: 2015.VII.19.14:08 - MIAÚ-RSS
The Journal MIAU has been working for 20+ years as a kind of public service!

Similarity analyses in the process of summative evaluation

Leading article: 2017. February (MIAU No. 222.)
(Previous article: MIAU No. 221.)

Keywords: everyone-can-be-the-same-principle, objectivity, automated evaluation

Abstract: The summative evaluation is a fundamental part of the school systems. In this paper, the author considers the summative evaluation a wide-spread practice (e.g. mid-term or end-of-year grading) Teachers, trying to reach the maximum objectivity of their grading system, may use various weighting methods to calculate the appropriate averages of the students’ previous grades. These weighting methods can be righteous but must be inevitably subjective as well. Using the similarity analysis software (COCO), there are other possibilities and this paper focuses on the introduction of some of them. The similarity analysis uses staircase functions to evaluate each unique value of every attribute instead of the global weight-coefficients. The anti-discriminative (Y0) method of the similarity analyses has a special “null hypothesis” considering every object (in this case: student) to be equal in the final summative evaluation. If a fitting set of staircase functions can not be found during the evaluation process, the confirmed “best” and “worst” students’ performance will be revealed. Being aware of these confirmed extremities of the students’ performance allows teachers to make their evaluation system more objective and to manage their available capacities more efficiently. More (PDF)


Please, send Your comments per email!

((Back))
miau.my-x.hu
myxfree.tool
rss.services