+ IBF (Idea-breeding-farm) +

We are proud of this study! close

+ MY-X DVD +

2020.XI.
BME-ETDK-1. place (incl. OTDK-access-right) with a study supported by the MY-X team!

2020.XI.
2 BPROF-Students (1. semester): 1. and 2. places (ETDK) + OTDK-access rights!

2020.III-VI.
QuILT: distance education with avatars in English!

2020.VI.
More and more qualitative studies in English from Students of the international courses!

2019.IX.
The Liebig-rule is available in the traffic!

2018.IX.
Kecskemét-Conference about Innovation: presentation of the 2DM-game!

2018.VI.
MMO 2018 conference: the best presentation of the session (award for 2DM) + the best publication of the session (award for Rosling-animations)!



Last modified: 2015.VII.19.14:08 - MIAÚ-RSS
The Journal MIAU has been working for 20+ years as a kind of public service!
The MATARKA-view

Robot for attitude-risk exploration

Leading article: 2018. December (MIAU No. 244.)
(Previous article: MIAU No. 243.)

Keywords: similarity analysis, 2DM-frame

Abstract: The objective of the study is to show the steps leading to a context-free attitude-risk-evaluation robot which is demonstrated through an example coming from the field of the IT-security – especially it handles with biometrical techniques like fingerprint, face, palm, iris, retina, signature, writing speed, voice, DNA. The attitude-risk will be estimated in case of questionnaires about employee’s attitudes concerning the acceptance of biometrical techniques. Risk should be derived in an automated and consistence-oriented way. Risks can be interpreted both in form of unconscious misunderstanding of questions/answer-options and in form of conscious hidden preferences of the employees. Risk detection can be defined on contextual levels and/or based on context-free logs. The contextual way for risk detection leads to suspected answer-options, questions, persons – based on the estimated answers deriving from each person-question-answer-unit where the number of persons and/or questions should be maximized. The risk can be defined per answer-option as difference between the factual and the estimated answers. The elementary risk components can also be aggregated in case of persons and/or questions. The context-free logs describe the process of the answering based on timestamps and events like dragging/dropping option-cards as mouse movements where specific attributes can be derived from the raw log-data: e.g. duration of answering in general and per question/position, number of corrections, etc. In ideal case, the contextual and log-based suspects will be run parallel, it means, they will give a consistent picture through independent interpretation of contextual and behaviour patterns (which will lead to the same suspicions). Although the demonstration here and now uses phenomena of the IT-security but the entire system can be involved into arbitrary risk detection processes like harmony-defections of sport/work teams. More (DOC) *** More (PDF)


Please, send Your comments per email!

((Back))
miau.my-x.hu
myxfree.tool
rss.services