+ Patent based on similarity analyses +

+ IBF (Idea-breeding-farm) +

We are proud of this study! close

+ MY-X DVD +

2021.XII.
PhD-title succesfully realized with the support of the My-X team!

2021.XI.
KJE-ETDK-1. place (incl. OTDK-access-right) with a study supported by the MY-X team!

2020.XI.
BME-ETDK-1. place (incl. OTDK-access-right) with a study supported by the MY-X team!

2020.XI.
2 BPROF-Students (1. semester): 1. and 2. places (ETDK) + OTDK-access rights!

2020.III-VI.
QuILT: distance education with avatars in English!

2020.VI.
More and more qualitative studies in English from Students of the international courses!

2019.IX.
The Liebig-rule is available in the traffic!

2018.IX.
Kecskemét-Conference about Innovation: presentation of the 2DM-game!

2018.VI.
MMO 2018 conference: the best presentation of the session (award for 2DM) + the best publication of the session (award for Rosling-animations)!



The Journal MIAU has been working for 25+ years as a kind of public service!
MATARKA-nézet

Statement for the Reader:
the thoughts presented on the virtual sites of the e-Journal of MIAU
should be interpreted like e.g. Ramanudjan's notices:
the value of the thoughts comes from the inner world of the publication -
the publication channel is not part of the value-building-processes...

Instead of social media: MYX-team-NEWS

(Last modified: 2015.VII.19.14:08 - MIAÚ-RSS)

Anomalies of anonymous, parallel evaluations of publications

Leading article: 2021. September (MIAU No. 277.)
(Previous article: MIAU No. 276.)

Keywords: Best Student Papers, PhD-dissertation, article, responsibility

Abstract: The purpose of the paper is simple: based on anonymous, real (parallel created) evaluation reports it can be demonstrated a lot of anomalies in the evaluation system, in order to minimize the amount and/or the gravity of these anomalies where the gravity can be extended to the threshold of defamation constructs concerning Students being in good faith. The anonymity of the evaluators can not be seen as a necessary and useful parameter because the anonymous evaluators have no real responsibility for improving of the written materials. This anonymity is rather a cover for camouflaging not-understanding situations concerning evaluators. Unfortunately, the evaluations can also be seen as a kind of blaming victims. The parallel evaluations are mostly inconsistent where the evaluation system is not prepared and not willing to solve these anomalies what can also be interpreted as a kind of blaming victims. Victims are the motivated Students who have at least tried to prepare a paper instead of simulating learning activities. The anonymity of these official evaluation processes has the same characteristics as the poisonous anonymity of the Internet in general. Therefore, the particular evaluation systems do not lead to better papers: the conclusions of the first level evaluations (ETDK) definitive may not have any impact to the papers in the second level (OTDK). More (DOC) *** More (PDF)


Please, send Your comments per email!

((Back))
miau.my-x.hu
myxfree.tool
rss.services