close
ÔĽŅ

FIFA World Cup 2010 - MY-X News-Generator

Technical support

CodeURLDate
Cumulated cash-flow (%) in case of the most effective robot.URL2010-07-26 10:45
The earnings on virtual betting.URL2010-07-26 10:44
The results of the round of 16 didn't have any role in forming the opinions of robots in order to ensure transparency and traceability. Posterior evaluation of those results is a work in progress, because it can be seen that the Spanish team changed in a positive way compared to Netherlands, based on data of the first few days...URL2010-07-11 23:25
The curse was fulfilled again in the final: the less understood team (risk=50%) won despite the solid opinion of both robots, further strengthening the existence of sport-psychological specialty of models...n.a.2010-07-11 23:21
The dynamic conformation of the model which analyses condition changes during the group matches...URL2010-07-10 23:00
Paul is unbeatable! The CURSE-SPREADER robot has recovered, so the sport-psychology of the group matches and the last matches is similar, contrary to the logic of the rounds of 16 and 8... The only question that remains is whether it has been working like this so far and whether it will do so afterwards? URL2010-07-10 22:45
dbThe databases used for generating news, and the sources of these databases: World ranking of football clubs.URL2010-07-09 15:40
dbThe databases used for generating news, and the sources of these databases: countries.URL2010-07-09 15:40
dbThe databases used for generating news, and the sources of these databases: players.URL2010-07-09 15:40
dbThe databases used for generating news, and the sources of these databases: altitude.URL2010-07-09 15:40
dbThe databases used for generating news, and the sources of these databases: average temperature.URL2010-07-09 15:38
4The curse has been lifted! But Paul remained consistent...URL2010-07-07 22:33
4The CURSE has been running rampant for 13 matches: The exact opposite happens of everything the dynamic robot says, the one that monitors condition changes. This means that Germany is expected to defeat Spain, which is also enhanced by the non-recognition distortion. If the final is going to be Netherlands vs. Germany, then every robot predicts a Dutch victory, just as it can be seen on the attached chart, so based on the Curse of the models, Germany will be the winner of World Cup 2010! Or maybe not?URL2010-07-06 22:33
8A Robot2 √°tka imm√°r t√∂bb, mint hat√°sos: a csoportm√©rkőz√©sek 48 meccse alapj√°n sikeres modell a jelentősen megv√°ltozott keretfelt√©telek (pl. b√≠r√≥i hib√°k, egy√©ni hib√°k) mellett 10 meccsből egyetlen egyszer sem tal√°lta el az eredm√©nyt, vagyis mindenkor pontosan az elm√ļlt 12 h√≥nap adatai alapj√°n elv√°rhat√≥ form√°val ellent√©tes eredm√©ny sz√ľletett. Az URU:GHA meccse előtt kirajzolt k√©t erőt√©rből a fel nem ismer√©s m√°r akkor sem hib√°tlan erőtere √°llt szemben a m√°r akkor is hib√°tlan hazud√≥s (s√©rtődős?) modellel. S term√©szetesen (!?) győz√∂tt itt is a hangulati elem, vagyis a s√©rtőd√∂tts√©g √°tka...n.a.2010-07-02 23:40
8Models are mirrors. Rays of light reflected by the mirrors interfere. If these interferences can be interpreted logically and frequently, then the accusation and threat of coincidences are mild...n.a.2010-07-02 18:19
8S v√©g√ľl a PAR:ESP meccsre csak egyetlen modell-viselked√©si szab√°ly marad: ellent√©tes robotv√©lem√©nyek eset√©n, azonos fel nem ismerts√©gi szintek mellett győznie kellene az első robotnak, azaz a spanyol csapatnak...n.a.2010-07-02 18:16
8The Argentina-Germany match is not inconsistent, the two robots answer the same (therefore, they must be wrong) and it seems to be logical based on the knowledge level (knowledge level is based on how many times we failed to predict the outcomes of the matches of a team), this means that a German victory is to be expected based on the 'behavioral pattern' of the robots...n.a.2010-07-02 18:14
8Az URU:GHA meccsen k√©t elv √°ll egym√°ssal szemben: győzni-e kellene a kev√©sb√© kiismert csapatnak (ez ugye GHA lenne). De győznie kellene a konszolid√°lt robotnak, ha a formajavul√°st kompenz√°latlanul az elemz√©s alapjak√©nt elfogad√≥ robot m√°st mond...n.a.2010-07-02 18:12
8The rule recognized in case of the round of 16 remained in effect: whenever the two robots say the same, it has to be a wrong answer. A special situation occurred again after the mistakes of the referees: a rightfully self-confident team lost control over the match...n.a.2010-07-02 18:07
8The principles of the round of 16 (found in the previous post) and of the semifinals mean a coincident argumentation, which indicates: robots are mute now... The ability of artificial intelligences to answer 'I don't know' is a remarkable accomplishment, even if it burdens humans or human intuition somewhat more...n.a.2010-06-30 08:55
16The model that analyzes the changes in condition has become a lying model in case of the quarters: in all cases, the opposite came true of what could have happened! So every outcome is like those expected on paper! Furthermore, the consolidated robotic opinion proved to be erroneous in only those cases when it matched the separate opinion. Besides that, it is still true in cases where the models failed to predict a team's qualification that success could have been recognized at the ratio of 5 to 6 ...URL2010-06-30 08:45
Even though 'suddenness plays a significant role' in case of football (cf. game theory), we should be able to derive and explain the outcome of the next match based on available data (cf. similarity analysis): so, mixed strategies being optimal infinitely (cf. the book of L√°szl√≥ M√©rő: Moral Calculations: Game Theory, Logic and Human Frailty), and ad-hoc analyses are competitors (it is also possible, that they are related too)...URL2010-06-29 08:24
16Az egy√©bk√©nt fogad√°si √©s matematikai szempontb√≥l sikeresnek mondhat√≥ robotok √°ltal bizonyos kock√°zattal (= 4 r√©szmodellből h√°nyszor nem siker√ľlt felismerni a tov√°bbjut√≥ csapatot) kijel√∂lt tov√°bbjut√≥k k√∂z√ľl az első 5 meccs alapj√°n 4 esetben (80%-ban) az győz√∂tt, mely felismer√©se kisebb ar√°nyban volt lehets√©ges a vizsg√°lt adatok alapj√°n...URL2010-06-28 19:14
scoreBetween June 25 and July 11, 2010: The dynamic evaluation of the 16 qualifying teams.URL2010-06-28 11:33
scoreBetween June 4 and 25, 2010: The dynamic evaluation of the 32 qualifying teams.URL2010-06-28 11:33
16The robot that analyzes condition changes (viz. the chance of 'miracles') has encountered some currently unavoidable obstacles. The relatively high hit ratings concerning the 48 matches (which started to decline significantly even in the third round) have declined to zero, which cannot be entirely accidental. For example, the robot dislikes FIFA's strict adherence to tradition: even though billions of viewers can tell goal from 'not-goal', referees can't... Genuine will to win has not always been the case since the third round. However, models can be built upon these special situations, maybe even upon tolerance towards trivial mistakes of referees, but isn't that some sort of miracle-expectation among modelers?URL2010-06-27 22:28
scoreThe effect of the first day on the 16 team that qualified themselves for the next stage...URL2010-06-27 16:55
scoreThe dynamic score values of the group matches in case of all 32 teams (including the ratios at which qualifying teams were predicted)...URL2010-06-27 16:32
16The best robotic approximation could identify 11 out of the 16 qualifying teams. Another Robot, the one with the worst hit rating could identify another 4 teams that qualified themselves to the round of 16. Ghana is the only team that none of the robots predicted worthy to qualify itself for the next stage, unlike its competitors (AUS, SRB)... Is Ghana a real 'black' horse? URL2010-06-27 16:04
A gr√°fokr√≥l leolvashat√≥ inform√°ci√≥kat a hasonl√≥s√°gelemz√©s √©ppen √ļgy fel tudja dolgozni, mint a s√°rga lap, piros lap, stb. adatokat. A gr√°fban az a j√≥, hogy egy √ļjfajta input-sorozatot jelent, de ez nem elemz√©s, hanem vizualiz√°ci√≥. A legjobb j√°t√©kost ut√°na valamilyen egy√©b m√≥don √°lmodtak ki a gr√°fokb√≥l a kutat√≥k! n.a.2010-06-27 13:55
Alternative, competing model-logic (II)URL2010-06-27 13:50
Alternative, competing model-logic...URL2010-06-27 13:29
16As a consequence of the 48 group matches, two new learning models have to be developed: the task of the first model would be the correction of mistakenly recognized chances (e.g. Ghana), while the other model would help decide which robot to use, based on the experiences of former robot-competitions...n.a.2010-06-26 23:14
16Based on the dynamic view of Robot2, Slovakia may surprises us. Besides that, series of success in case of the great South American teams may easily break. Based on what could be seen on the latest match, the potential of Chile is uncertain...n.a.2010-06-26 09:14
No new model has been created for the knockout stage, because of the high static and dynamic hit ratings experienced in case of the group matches, so we should be able to calculate meaningful hit ratings with the old models, based on the score values already known. It is indeed timely now, when the relevance of tactics diminished in the knockout stage, but another viewpoint has become relevant: psychic stability...URL2010-06-25 23:50
Following the dynamic signs is a success: only four such signs could have been derived from the data of 48 matches, and they all proved to be true! The effect of these signs on the profit-making capability in case of betting will soon be announced...URL2010-06-25 23:45
The analytical and betting experience of the group matches: as it can be seen on the summary table of the game page, the model which refines the odds (consolidated analysis) has proven to be more successful than the condition timing model (the one examining the similarity to the ideal team) in mathematical sense. Hit ratings are convincing even after exclusion of the doubtful matches and fix draws. Hit ratings for groups never dropped below the line of doubtfulness (67 %). Hit ratings per rounds are increasingly stable in case of the model which is more successful mathematically, while in the unconsolidated model, the hit ratings decreased significantly in the last round. Contrary to that the consolidated model doesn't provide a meaningful betting profit, because the multipliers for the teams favored on paper are significantly lower. The differences between the hit ratings for the last round raises the suspicion that the 'black horses' revealed by the condition timing models may burn out quickly, or skills has been overshadowed by tactics (cf. CHI:ESP)...URL2010-06-25 23:43
scoreDynamic views before the closing of group D...URL2010-06-23 20:21
betNew rates of return without dynamic corrections for the time being...URL2010-06-23 19:57
NGA KOREven though Nigeria shows a mildly negative tendency, while South Korea shows a significantly positive one, the advantage of Nigeria hasn't yet diminished completely...URL2010-06-22 20:36
scoreSpecial forecasts for the third round...URL2010-06-22 20:09
scoreThe score animation in its present state (June 4-21, 2010)...URL2010-06-22 20:04
scoreBecause of the significant fluctuation in condition in case of Uruguay, any outcome is likely, but Mexico is not really threatened in light of the numbers... URL2010-06-22 19:59
scoreSouth Africa showed a good condition on the opening game and now stands a fair chance against France...URL2010-06-22 19:57
scoreThe wrongful prediction of declining chance in case of Brazil has happened due to an erroneous data-process!n.a.2010-06-22 19:56
Team set-ups being closer to the dream-teams reduce the number of fouls, but increase the number of cards, the chance to score goals, but decreases the number of shots, offside positions, corners, the percentage of possession, so the dream team is more pragmatic on average...URL2010-06-21 10:34
scoreFew changes based on the consolidated orders, but Brazilian chances are wearing thin even on this chart...URL2010-06-20 20:45
scoreAs it can clearly be derived from the dynamics of the score values, the indisposition of Slovakia was no coincidence, and Brazil's chances against Ivory Coast are waning!?URL2010-06-20 20:30
GER SRBThe German team has a positive trend of the chance-change. The team from Serbia has a negative trend of scores. But the chance of a victory for Serbia is still seemingly higher... Can produce Serbia a new surprise like SUI? URL2010-06-18 13:13
betThe bet-rentability of the Tip(p)Robot (based on condition timing directly) is high!URL2010-06-18 08:49
USADream-team and the facts: USAURL2010-06-17 20:32
ENGDream-team and the facts: EnglandURL2010-06-17 20:32
SVNDream-team and the facts: SloveniaURL2010-06-17 20:32
ALGDream-team and the facts: AlgeriaURL2010-06-17 20:31
ARGDream-team and the facts: ArgentinaURL2010-06-17 18:54
GREDream-team and the facts: GreeceURL2010-06-17 18:54
KORDream-team and the facts: South-KoreaURL2010-06-17 18:53
NGADream-team and the facts: Nigeria URL2010-06-17 18:53
GRE NGAThe GRE : NGA scores have an unstable relation, therefore both parties can win...URL2010-06-17 16:35
scoreNew tips with special methods... (V) URL2010-06-16 18:04
scoreThe model (analysing the condition timing directly/not consolidated to the FIFA ranking values) has a dynamic characteristics... IMPORTANT: This model was able (2010.VI.04.) to forecast the victory of Switzerland and this model has also the best fitting in case of virtual bets!URL2010-06-16 18:03
scoreNew tips with special methods... (IV)URL2010-06-15 22:01
scoreBackground information for new tips with special methods... (IV)URL2010-06-15 22:00
betNew win-chances of bets...URL2010-06-15 21:59
scoreOverview about the dynamic scores... (The condition timing analysis brings a more and more sophisticated feeling.)URL2010-06-14 19:54
betIt is seemingly worth using the tips of the Tip(p)Robot based on the direct condition timing...especially, if You think about the match JPN:CMR...URL2010-06-14 19:34
scoreNew tips with special methods... (III)URL2010-06-14 19:31
scoreBackground information for new tips with special methods... (III)URL2010-06-14 19:30
MEXDream-team and the facts: MexicoURL2010-06-14 19:27
RSADream-team and the facts: South AfricaURL2010-06-14 19:27
URUDream-team and the facts: UruguayURL2010-06-14 19:26
FRADream-team and the facts: FranceURL2010-06-14 19:25
scoreNew scores (2010.VI.12.)! Important information: The score of Germany is already higher than the score for Australia. The more successful teams on the WC have a characteristics being more similar to Germany than Australia...URL2010-06-13 18:07
Ha majd hi√°nyzik... Wenn es Ihnen bereits fehlen sollte...If you feel, You need a bit more...URL2010-06-13 15:43
scoreThe parallel tips (of 2010.VI.04, generated basically for the first matches of each group // based on consolidated and not consolidated methodology) show significantly that the group C will bring the most risk! In order to be able to explore sport-psychological effects, new analyses should be produced before the second matches of the groups...URL2010-06-13 09:53
betThe first bet-results based on the tipp.xls. (The same will be presented as soon as possible with the consolidated and not consolidated tips...)URL2010-06-13 08:49
scoreAfter 4 matches the 2 models (consolidated and "condition change"-based) has seemingly the same fitting. But: it could be seen, that the non-consolidated model had a lot of important signals as the other one focused more on the FIFA ranking list. The next match will be a watershed: namely the competitive model logics have totally different results! The methodological question should be clarified: What type of compensation is adequate in case of a given match? This is a typical learning problem. And a real Bet-Robot (<>Tip-Robot<>News-Generator) could built new models to this question... n.a.2010-06-12 18:07
scoreThe estimation consolidated to the FIFA ranking values seems to be more unstable (after 3 matches) as the model for condition timing...URL2010-06-12 15:57
scoreNews scores (2010.VI.11.) based on the results of the first day...URL2010-06-12 14:24
URULodeiro seems to be a wrong decision...URL2010-06-11 22:15
In the first new analysis, values of two attributes ('deviation from average altitude' and 'deviation from average temperature') of South African stadiums has been subtracted from the values of the capital cities of those countries participating in the world cup, and a 'higher is better' principle has been assumed. Therefore, those who come from higher altitudes have a better chance to win at a certain stadium. Similarly, this principle is assumed in case of temperatures too (the warmer country the players come from, the better they endure warm conditions). In the second analysis, groups of countries were formed based on their deviation from their native altitude and climate conditions. In case of altitudes of the countries, four values (1-4) has been assigned for four different altitude ranges: Between 0 and 100 meters (1), Between 100 and 500 meters (2), 500m-1000m (3), 1000m and higher (4). Similarly to altitudes, there are four different temperature ranges: between 0 and 5 ¬įC (1), between 5 and 10 ¬įC (2), between 10 and 15 ¬įC (3), and above 15 ¬įC (4). Therefore the variation options of environmental effects have been narrowed down artificially... n.a.2010-06-11 21:49
RSAThrough human-eyes: South-Africa had excellent time periods (cf. before goal). On the other hand RSA has an unstable soul...n.a.2010-06-11 21:26
scoreBackground information (II)URL2010-06-11 15:55
scoreBackground information (I)URL2010-06-11 15:55
scoreTwo tip-series based on different approaches...URL2010-06-11 15:54
scoreNew Scores (2010.VI.10)! These Chances were generated according to the last match of each team. The new variable will be changed at once, if a WC-match will be closed. Therefore new scores will be produced step by step...URL2010-06-10 19:07
SVNSVN 'Best of lists' for Slovenia according to each position. Goal-keepers: Samir Handanovic > Aleksander Seliga > Jasmin Handanovic. Defenders: Matej Mavric > Marko Suler > Bostjan Cesar > Bojan Jokic > Elvedin Dzinic > Miso Brecko > Suad Filekovic > Branko Ilic. Midfielder: Robert Koren > Andrej Komac > Andraz Kirm > Aleksandar Radosavljevic > Rene Krhin > Dalibor Stevanovic. Strikers: Milivoje Novakovic > Zlatan Ljubijankic > Valter Birsa > Nejc Pecnik > Tim Matavz > Zlatko Dedic.URL2010-06-09 19:45
ALGALG 'Best of lists' for Algeria according to each position. Goal-keepers: Faouzi Chaouchi > Lounes GAOUAOUI > Rais M BOLHI. Defenders: Djamel Mesbah > Abdelkader LAIFAOUI > Carl Medjani > Nadir Belhadj = Anthar YAHIA = Madjid Bougherra = Rafik Halliche > Habib BELLAID. Midfielder: Mehdi Lacen > Hassan Yebda > Yazid MANSOURI = Karim Zi√°ni = Karim Matmour > Djamel Abdoun = Foued Kadir > Ryad Boudebouz > Adlane GUEDIOURA. Strikers: Rafik SAIFI = Abdelkader Ghezzal = Rafik DJEBBOUR. URL2010-06-09 19:41
USAUSA 'Best of lists' for USA according to each position. Goal-keepers: Tim Howard > Marcus Hahnemann > Brad Guzan. Defenders: Carlos Bocanegra > Steve Cherundolo > Jonathan Bornstein > Clarence Goodson > Jonathan Spector > Jay DeMerit > Oguchi Onyewu. Midfielder: Clint Dempsey > DaMarcus Beasley > Landon Donovan > José Francisco Torres > Michael Bradley > Benny Feilhaber > Stuart Holden > Ricardo Clark > Maurice Edu. Strikers: Jozy Altidore = Robbie Findley > Edson Buddle > Herculez Gomez. URL2010-06-09 19:39
ENGENG 'Best of lists' for England according to each position. Goal-keepers: David James > Robert Green > Joe Hart. Defenders: John Terry > Jamie Carragher > Ashley Cole > Matthew Upson > Rio Ferdinand > Stephen Warnock > Glen Johnson > Ledley King. Midfielder: Frank Lampard > Steven Gerrard > Joe Cole > Shaun Wright-Phillips > Michael Carrick > James Milner > Gareth Barry > Aaron Lennon. Strikers: Wayne Rooney > Peter Crouch > Jermain Defoe > Emile Heskey.URL2010-06-09 19:36
NGA KOR ARG GRENGA : KOR : ARG : GRE Chances in the group B: NGA > KOR > ARG > GRE. URL2010-06-09 19:30
ENG USA ALG SVNData assets: Facts and estimations about the players in the group C URL2010-06-09 13:13
SVNData assets: Facts and estimations about the players from Slovenia in the group CURL2010-06-09 12:03
Innovative WC-scheduling (graphical OLAP)URL2010-06-09 11:58
ALGData assets: Facts and estimations about the players from Algeria in the group CURL2010-06-09 11:17
USAData assets: Facts and estimations about the players from USA in the group CURL2010-06-09 10:09
ENG ALGENG : ALG Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If England (being inconsistent to the paper form and to the analyses) loses against USA on the basis of "change of form analysis" and Algeria (which team truly does show signs of being exhausted, so the expectation of a miracle does not justify) loses against Slovenia, then the USA is pushed forward only by its advantage, which is predictable based on the FIFA world ranking, while Slovenia starts a loss in form, a victory for England has the biggest chance.URL2010-06-08 20:00
ENG ALGENG : ALG Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If England (being inconsistent to the paper form and to the analyses) loses against USA on the basis of "change of form analysis" and Algeria (which team does not show signs of being exhausted) plays a draw against Slovenia, then based on the equalization of forms for both teams the ENG : ALG match has a big chance for a draw.URL2010-06-08 19:43
ENG ALGENG : ALG Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If England (being inconsistent to the paper form and to the analyses) loses against USA on the basis of "change of form analysis" and Algeria (which team does not show signs of being exhausted) defeats Slovenia, then the result could be a such great change in psychic form in the Algeria team, that a victory for Algeria has the bigger chance.URL2010-06-08 19:42
ENG ALGENG : ALG Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If England (by justifying the "change of form analysis" and the "primary statements") plays a draw against USA (which team has a bigger condition instability) and Algeria (which team truly does show signs of being exhausted, so the expectation of a miracle does not justify) loses against Slovenia, then the result could be a such great change in psychic form in the England team, that a victory for England has the biggest chance.URL2010-06-08 19:41
ENG ALGENG : ALG Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If England (by justifying the "change of form analysis" and the "primary statements") plays a draw against USA (which team has a bigger condition instability) and Algeria (which team does not show signs of being exhausted) also plays a draw against Slovenia, then the result could be a such great change in psychic form in the England team, that a victory for England has the bigger chance.URL2010-06-08 19:39
ENG ALGENG : ALG Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If England (by justifying the "change of form analysis" and the "primary statements") plays a draw against USA (which team has a bigger condition instability) and Algeria (which team does not show signs of being exhausted) defeats Slovenia, then based on the equalization of forms for both teams the ENG : ALG match has a big chance for a draw.URL2010-06-08 19:37
ENG ALGENG : ALG Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If England (by utilizing its advantage on the FIFA championship table and being consistent to the analyses) defeats USA (which team has a bigger condition instability) and Algeria (which team truly does show signs of being exhausted, so the expectation of a miracle does not justify) loses against Slovenia, then the result could be a such great change in psychic form in the England team, that a victory for England has the biggest chance.URL2010-06-08 19:36
ENG ALGENG : ALG Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If England (by utilizing its advantage on the FIFA championship table and being consistent to the analyses) defeats USA (which team has a bigger condition instability) and Algeria (which team does not provide signs of being exhausted) plays a draw against Slovenia, then the result could be a such great change in psychic form in the England team, that a victory for England has the biggest chance.URL2010-06-08 19:34
ENG ALGENG : ALG Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If England (by utilizing its advantage on the FIFA championship table and being consistent to the analyses) defeats USA (which team has a bigger condition instability) and Algeria (which team does not provide signs of being exhausted, that is the expectation of a miracle justifies) defeats Slovenia, then the result could be a such great change in psychic form in the England team, that a victory for England has a bigger chance than a draw.URL2010-06-08 19:33
ENG ALGENG : ALG In the 9 upcoming news you can read about the conditional pros and cons for the Slovenia-USA match, where the 2 teams have been pondered by the possible results of their previous matches by the Tip Robot.URL2010-06-08 19:31
URU FRAURU : FRA Compensation calculus: Converting the direct changes in form into position changes to the world ranking list would allow both Uruguay and France a rise. (Uruguay from position 16th to 12th / France from 9th to 4th.) Since the rise for both countries are almost the same, Uruguay cannot catch up with France. Therefore a victory for France or accidentally a draw is possible. URL2010-06-08 19:24
URU FRAURU : FRA Change in form analysis: Considering the changes in from in the past 1 year, France has the chance to outplay Uruguay, though the illustration only reflects the changes in position mapped by the model as a fraction of the effects, the changes in points and the impact of the points aren't. Considering the past 12 months' position and point changes on the FIFA championship table France, shows a little better overall, and also starts from a better rank position than Uruguay. A draw could also be possible since the changes in form between the 2 countries aren't really major. URL2010-06-08 19:23
URU FRAURU : FRA Primary statement based on FIFA data: Taking the FIFA championship table trend back in the 12 months for basis, Uruguay and France both have improved in trend, concerning the changes in form for the 2 countries French victory is expected, since condition instability for France is less considerable and also they start from a better world ranking list position. However a draw cannot be precluded due to the major changes in form in the team of Uruguay noticed in the past period. URL2010-06-08 19:22
RSA MEXMEX : MEX Compensation calculus: Converting the direct changes in form into position changes to the world ranking list would allow both South Africa and Mexico a rise. (South Africa from position 83rd to 81st / Mexico from 17th to 6th). Since South Africa produces a smaller rise and also starts from a deeper position on the world ranking list, it cannot catch up with Mexico. Therefore victory likely goes to Mexico.URL2010-06-08 19:20
RSA MEXMEX : MEX Change in form analysis: Considering the changes in from in the past 1 year, Mexico has the chance to outplay South Africa, though the illustration only reflects the changes in position mapped by the model as a fraction of the effects, the changes in points and the impact of the points aren't. Considering the past 12 months' position and point changes on the FIFA championship table Mexico shows a better overall, and also starts from a better rank position than South Africa. URL2010-06-08 19:18
RSA MEXMEX : MEX Primary statement based on FIFA data: Taking the FIFA championship table trend back in the 12 months for basis, South Africa shows a perishable tendency discrepant to Mexico, but on the other hand Mexico seems to reach its potential limits (saturation curve limit), but starts from a better ranking list position, so Mexican victory is expected.URL2010-06-08 19:16
NGA ARG KOR GREData assets: Facts and estimations about the players in the group BURL2010-06-08 17:23
ENGData assets: Facts and estimations about the players from England in the group CURL2010-06-08 17:10
Methodological guide: Data and speculation about the fist matches of the groups, where many attributes of only 4 team are calculated, and the analysis about condition changes (which can be made on the basis of the dynamics of FIFA rankings) appears to be the same as in group B (so the consistency of the news can be approximated). In case of group A, France is favored vs. Mexico if only the group data are considered, but Mexico reflects a better image in light of the data of more than 200 national teams...URL2010-06-08 17:08
NGA ARG KOR GREData assets: Facts and estimations about the chances in the group BURL2010-06-08 17:03
scoreMethodological guide: The FIFA world ranking is a static, subjective estimation which lacks a learning process. Based on the ranking, a world cup should be won by the top team of the ranking. Contrary to that, a condition analysis, which monitors the monthly FIFA data, is dynamic, sadly however, it is also a solution that lacks learning and its uniqueness is unproven. That is the maximum of 'wonder-expectation' (i.e. a bad or underrated team defeats a better or overrated team). The Tip-Robot's first score refined this wonder-expectation with a linear compensation (so this solution is dynamic too, however, in that case we can't talk about real learning, but the need to make compensation calculations could be confirmed with similarity analysis (Y = compensated ranking). And the score calculation on June 8th, 2010 stifled the primary condition-fluctuation of FIFA data with a similarity analysis about sustainability (Y = 12 months of condition-advances, FIFA). The score values of June 4th, 2010 show the real maximal wonder-expectation, while the score values of June 8th, 2010 show the maximally real, which is now confirmed by the learning sample and the similarity analysis control calculation. Conclusion: Currently, none of these models meet the methodological criterion allowing them to predict the outcome of matches based on the scored and received goals and they are unable to derive (as the most logical answer) if all outcomes are possible in case of a certain match. The models introduced here are always guessing outcomes and mostly derive that a bigger team is more probable to win...URL2010-06-08 16:52
scoreThe second (2010.VI.08) score-estimation of the Tip(p)Robot can be seen in the attached animation. Comments about the methodologies will be available in the next news-item...URL2010-06-08 16:39
FRA URUVisual effects as the source of wrong interpretations: As it can be seen (URL) the trends can be interpreted as a positive signal for Uruguay. But it is not so: two independent trends of condition changes may only be identified. This figure is to interpret easier: both teams realize a condition stabilization, but one of them downwards, ans the other team up stairs...URL2010-06-08 16:34
GREGRE 'Best of lists' for Greece according to each position. Goal-keepers: Kostas Chalkias > Alexandros TZORVASMichalis Sifakis. Defenders: Vasílis Torosídis> Sotirios KYRGIAKOS> Nikos SPIROPOULOS> Sokratis Papastathopoulos > Vangelis Moras > Giourkas SEITARIDIS> Avraam PAPADOPOULOS> Stelios Malezas > Loukas Vyntra. Midfielder: Georgios KARAGOUNIS> Konsztandínosz Kacuránisz Sotiris Ninis > Christos PATSATZOGLOU> Sakis Prittas > Alexandros TZIOLIS. Strikers: Dimitrios SALPINGIDIS> Theofanis GEKAS> Angelos CHARISTEAS> Georgios SAMARAS> Pantelis KAPETANOSURL2010-06-08 10:33
KORKOR 'Best of lists' for South-Korea according to each position. Goal-keepers: LEE Woon Jae > Kim Young-Kwang > Jung Sung-Ryong. Defenders: Lee Young Pyo > Lee Jung-Soo > Csha Du Ri > Kang Min-Soo > Oh Beom-Seok > Kim Dong-Jin > Cho Yong-Hyung > Kim Hyung Il. Midfielder: Park Ji Sung > Lee Chung-Yong > Kim Jae Sung > Kim Nam Il > Cho Won-Hee > Ki Sung-Yong > Kim Bo-Kyung > Kim Jung-Woo. Strikers: Lee Dong-Gook > Park Chu Young > Ahn Jung Hwan > Lee Seung-Ryul. URL2010-06-08 10:30
ARGARG 'Best of lists' for Argentina according to each position. Goal-keepers: Diego Pozo > Mariano And√ļjar > Sergio Romero. Defenders: Nicol√°s Burdisso > Walter Samuel > Gabriel Heinze > Clemente Rodr√≠guez > Mart√≠n Demichelis > Ariel Garc√© > Nicol√°s Otamendi. Midfielder: Javier Mascherano > Mario Bolatti = Jon√°s Guti√©rrez = Juan Sebasti√°n Ver√≥n > Maxi Rodr√≠guez > Javier Pastore > √Āngel di Mar√≠a. Strikers: Lionel Messi > Sergio Ag√ľero > Diego Milito > Gonzalo Higua√≠n > Mart√≠n Palermo > Carlos T√©vez URL2010-06-08 10:26
NGANGA 'Best of lists' for Nigeria according to each position. Goal-keepers: Vincent Enyeama Austin Ejide > Dele Aiyenugba. Defenders: Joseph Yobo > Taye Taiwo > Rabiu Afolabi > Chidi Odiah > Danny Shittu > Dele Adeleye > Uwa Elderson Echiéjilé. Midfielder: John Obi Mikel >John Utaka > Dickson Etuhu > Kalu Uche > Ayila Yussuf > Lukman Haruna > Sani Kaita. Strikers: Yakubu Aiyegbeni > Victor Obinna > Nwankwo Kanu > Obafemi Martins > Peter Odemwingie > Chinedu Obasi.URL2010-06-08 10:23
ARG NGA KOR GREAs well as the raw data assets and the raw estimations appropriate analyses will be published as soon as possible about the ranking of players according their positions in the team. The chances will be also analysed in the group A.n.a.2010-06-07 21:53
GREData assets: Facts and estimations about the players from Greece of the group B URL2010-06-07 21:44
KORData assets: Facts and estimations about the players from South-Korea of the group B URL2010-06-07 16:33
NGAData assets: Facts and estimations about the players from Nigeria of the group B URL2010-06-07 14:36
RSA MEX URU FRAData assets: Facts and estimations about the first matches in the group AURL2010-06-07 14:24
ARGData assets: Facts and estimations about the players from Argentina of the group BURL2010-06-07 13:41
RSA MEX URU FRAData assets: Facts and estimations about the players in the group AURL2010-06-07 13:14
Vade-mecum: Other analysts work in this way... But where are the logic and the consistency? Long live spurious correlation?! A really good robot expert has to be able to say: I do not know...URL2010-06-04 21:06
Methodological guide: Knowledge of the following relevant terms may be useful for the interpretation of the GENERATED NEWS: 'lie' = deliberately and verifiably wrong statement (e.g. the ball is cylinder-shaped), 'demagoguery/stupidity' = deliberately/instinctively wrong association (e.g. the progenitor of modern football is England, therefore all world cups have to be won by England) 'circumlocution' = half-truth (e.g. the English team has the oldest football traditions, so their chance to achieve victory is higher than anyone else's), unique INFORMATION = logical conclusion (e.g. a team showing a continuous decline of its condition may have less chance to win a than team showing the exact opposite) complex INFORMATION = a chain of unique news freed of inconsistencies (e.g. if a team shows an improving condition on a very important opening game and defeats the other team which is otherwise considered better (thus their declining condition is proven) then the aspiring team may be capable of everything) 'truth' = a predictive model that doesn't have to be able answer all question, and may be verified objectively later on (e.g. the winning team cannot be determined with adequate probability even when the partial results correspond with each other and all known factors are taken into consideration), 'demagoguery leaning towards over-learning' = 'nonsense' (e.g. using a model based on the posterior analysis of the previous world cup on the current teams to determine the expected winner)URL2010-06-04 16:29
scoreTipRobot: The analysis of condition changes makes certain wonders possible...URL2010-06-04 13:59
scoreAs well as the estimation of JP-Morgan, the first score-analysis of the Tip(p)Robot (incl. all 32 teams) can be seen henceforward. The form changes (detected through similarity analysis) was transformed into consolidated FIFA world ranks in order to fine tune realistic chances of wonders... URL2010-06-04 13:06
RSA MEX URU FRARSA:MEX:URU:FRA 9 French and 2 South African players go into the deam team of group 'A'. You can view the details by clicking on the URL.URL2010-06-04 12:03
RSA MEX URU FRARSA:MEX:URU:FRA The dream forwards of group 'A': Nicolas Anelka (FRA) and Thierry Henry (FRA). On the basis of the performances given till now Diego Forl√°n, the forward of Uruguay is not justified to put in to the dream team.URL2010-06-04 11:58
SVN USASVN : USA Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If Slovenia (being inconsistent to the paper form and to the analyses) loses against Algeria (which team doesn't provide signs of being exhausted, that is the expectation of a miracle justifies) and the USA defeats England on the basis of "change of form analysis", then the result would be a such great change of forms in the USA, that they would have the biggest chance to win.URL2010-06-04 11:49
SVN USASVN : USA Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If Slovenia (being inconsistent to the paper form and to the analyses) loses against Algeria (which team doesn't provide signs of being exhausted, that is the expectation of a miracle justifies) and the USA achieves a draw against England, on the basis of "change of form analysis" and of the "primary statments", then the result could be a such great change of forms in the USA, that they would have the biggest chance to win. URL2010-06-04 11:48
SVN USASVN : USA Conditional pros and cons: : Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If Slovenia (being inconsistent to the paper form and to the analyses) loses against Algeria (which team doesn't provide signs of being exhausted, that is the expectation of a miracle justifies) and the USA loses against England on the basis of the typical estimation of the models, then the USA will be only pulled by the moment of inertia supposed on the basis of the FIFA championship table, while Slovenia starts a loss in form, a victory for the USA has a better chance. URL2010-06-04 11:47
SVN USASVN : USA Conditional pros and cons: : Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If Slovenia (by justifying the possible result of the changes in form analysis) plays a draw against Algeria (which team doesn't provide signs of being exhausted) and the USA defeats England (on the basis of "changes in form analysis"), then there could be a great change in psychic form in the USA team, that could lead to victory with the biggest chance. URL2010-06-04 11:46
RSA MEX URU FRARSA:MEX:URU:FRA The best defenders of group 'A' are: Patrice Evra (FRA), Bacary Sagna (FRA), William Gallas (FRA) and Tsepo Masilela (RSA). So the answer to the question asked before: so the backs of group A's dream team consists of the French trio complemented by a South African defender.URL2010-06-04 11:45
SVN USASVN : USA Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If Slovenia (by justifying the possible result of the changes in form analysis) achieves a draw against Algeria (which team doesn't provide signs of being exhausted) and the USA achieves a draw as well against England on the basis of "change of form analysis" and of the "primary statments" the result could be a such great change of forms in the USA, that there is a bigger change for the USA to win, than to achieve a draw.URL2010-06-04 11:44
SVN USASVN : USA Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If Slovenia (by justifying the possible result of the changes in form analysis) only achieves a draw against Algeria (which team doesn't provide signs of being exhausted) and the USA (based on the average estimations of the models) loses against England, then based on the equalization of declining forms for both the USA and Slovenia the Slovenia : USA match has a big chance for a draw.URL2010-06-04 11:42
SVN USASVN : USA Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If Slovenia (by utilizing its advantage on the FIFA championship table and the perfect form timing uncovered by the analysis) defeats Algeria (which team truly does show signs of being exhausted, so the expectation of a miracle doesn't justify) and the USA defeats England on the basis of "change of form analysis", then the result could be a such great change in psychic form that a victory for the USA has a bigger chance than a draw. URL2010-06-04 11:40
SVN USASVN : USA Conditional pros and cons: Considering the sport psychological effects of the first matches: If Slovenia (by utilizing its advantage on the FIFA championship table and the perfect form timing uncovered by the analysis) defeats Algeria(which team truly does show signs of being exhausted, so the expectation of a miracle doesn't justify) and the USA only achieves a draw against England on the basis of "change of form analysis" and and of the "primary statments", then based on the equalization of improving forms for both the USA and Slovenia the Slovenia : USA match has a big chance for a draw.URL2010-06-04 11:35
SVN USASVN : USA Pondering over chances : Considering the sport-psychological effect of the first matches: If Slovenia(exploiting its situational advantage on the FIFA world ranking and the excellent timing that has been uncovered by the analysis) defeats Algeria (if the exhaustion symptoms revealed in case of that team prove to be true) and the USA (based on the average estimations of the models) loses against England, then the USA is pushed forward only by its advantage, which is predictable based on the FIFA world ranking, whereas Slovenia is motivated by a run of luck so the Slovenian victory is more likely than a draw.URL2010-06-04 11:32
SVN USASVN : USA In the 9 upcoming news you can read about the conditional pros and cons for the Slovenia-USA match, where the 2 teams have been pondered by the possible results of their previous matches by the Tip Robot. By clicking on the URL you can view a navigation interface which can be used to filter news with considering the combinations concerning the results of the previous matches (1,X,2). URL2010-06-04 11:31
RSA MEX URU FRARSA:MEX:URU:FRA Do you think Uruguayan striker Diego Forl√°n good enough to be one of the 2 best strikers of group' A'? You may get the answer one hour later.n.a.2010-06-04 10:41
RSA MEX URU FRARSA:MEX:URU:FRA The best midfielder in group A is the French Franck Ribéry. You can see further details of the sequence by clicking on the URL.URL2010-06-04 10:34
RSA MEX URU FRARSA:MEX:URU:FRA Based on the foregoing performances, the best defender in the group 'A' is a French player, Patrice Evra . France contributes to the best 11 with 3 defenders. What is your opinion, the player of which nation will be the 4th back? We'll get the answer one hour later. n.a.2010-06-04 10:30
ALG SVNALG : SVN Compensation calculus: Converting the direct changes in form into position changes to the world ranking list would allow both Slovenia and Algeria a major rise. Since Algeria started to show the signs of being exhausted but also a more radical level catch up compared to Slovenia deeper, presumably he won’t be able to catch up with Slovenia. Surely the compensational change in positions are almost the same within the 2 teams. Therefore Slovenian victory is the more likely.URL2010-06-04 10:21
ALG SVNALG : SVN Change in form analysis: Considering the changes in from in the past 1 year, Slovenia has the chance to outplay Algeria, though the illustration only reflects the changes in position mapped by the model as a fraction of the effects, the changes in points and the impact of the points aren’t. Considering the past 12 months' position and point changes on the FIFA championship table Slovenia shows a better overall, and also starts from a better rank position than Algeria. It can also end up with a draw, because the changes in form had a bigger wave concerning Algeria, which can empower them with any kind of surprise. URL2010-06-04 10:21
ALG SVNALG : SVN Primary statement based on FIFA data: Taking the FIFA championship table trend back in the 12 months for basis, Algeria and Slovenia both have improved in trend, with a difference that Algeria seems to reach its limits (saturation curve limit), so additional notable improvements cannot be expected from Algeria, that is likely a Slovenian victory to say. Surely Slovenia is better on the world ranking list already.URL2010-06-04 10:20
RSA MEX URU FRARSA:MEX:URU:FRA On the basis of performances given till now the best goalkeeper from group 'A' is Steve Mandanda from France. You can view the order by clicking the URL. URL2010-06-04 10:11
RSA MEX URU FRARSA:MEX:URU:FRA What do you think how would the dream team of the group look like? Who would give the most players out of the 4 team?n.a.2010-06-04 09:58
ENG USAENG : USA Compensation calculus: By converting the straight change of forms to change of positions in the world ranking list England and USA would both move forward (From the position of 14th to 7th for the USA / from the 8th to the 4th for England.) Since the larger increase of the USA does not compensate England's acquired advantage on the championship table the USA doesn't or barely reaches England. Consequently is British victory or incidentally a draw is the most likely.URL2010-06-04 09:48
FRAFRA Our robotic expert has determined the French starting 11 against Uruguay on the basis of the players' performance. You can view it by clicking on the URL. URL2010-06-04 09:48
ENG USAENG : USA Change of form analysis: Considering the change of form in the past 1 year the USA has a slight chance of outplaying England, a draw could be more reasonable. It is because the USA shows a better overall in points on the FIFA championship table and the changes of position and points considering the past 1 year. The illustration only shows a part impact of the position changes mapped by the model, but it doesn't show the changes of points and the impact of them.URL2010-06-04 09:45
ENG USAENG : USA Primary statement based on FIFA data: If we take the twelve-month trend of FIFA's world ranking, then England shows a worsening trend just like the USA, based on the declining condition of the two 'ailing' teams, an English victory is expected, because the variation in condition in case of the English team is not so substantial, and they start from a better ranking position. However, a draw may also be expected, because the teams are ailing in the same time.URL2010-06-04 09:39
FRAFRA Lassana Diarra is only the 8th best midfielder in the French national team. By clicking on the URL you can view the midfielder players' order formed by our robotic expert relating to the French team.URL2010-06-04 09:36
FRAFRA A great misfortune has befallen on the French national team, since it came to light that Lassana Diarra has a stomach disease and so he cannot go to the World Cup." (http://www.nemzetisport.hu/labdarugo_vb_2010/vb-2010-lassana-diarra-nem-tarthat-a-franciakkal-del-afrikaba-2029770/). According to your opinion did he fall out from the solid starting 11 against Uruguay? n.a.2010-06-04 00:32
FRAFRA Our robotic expert would choose Patrice Evra, Bacary Sagna, William Gallas, Anthony R√©veille`re as defenders against Uruguay. √Čric Abidal is only the fifth best defender in the national team. You can view the order of the French defenders by clicking the URL.URL2010-06-03 13:16
FRAFRA According to your opinion would it be a good choice to put √Čric Abidal, a defender of FC Barcelona into the starting 11? URL2010-06-03 12:19
FRAFRA According to your opinion does it stand to reason that Djibril Cissé, who scored 23 goals in 28 matches playing in team Panathinaikos, fits in the starting 11 of France?URL2010-06-03 11:49
FRAFRA Our robotic expert says Henry (FC Barcelona) and Anelka (Chelsea FC) would be the perfect choice of forwards to go against Uruguay on 11. July 2010.URL2010-06-03 11:47
Data asset: In order to calculate the chances of winning, the public sport statistics need to be converted to structured data assets, which is hereby shared with every enquirer. First you can download the data of the previous World Cup (2006) from the enclosed URL... URL2010-06-02 15:40
scoreThe first team scores (win ratings) calculated by the MY-X Tip-Robot are based on the matches played in the past twelve months and the scores are recalculated after each subsequent match. Before the start of the World Cup, FIFA's monthly world ranking data (points, changes in points and ranks compared to the previous period are used for the calculation. Until the publication of our own analyses, we consider the JP Morgan's Quantitative Guide to World Cup 2010 as the best practice...URL2010-06-02 15:25
URUURU There are 6 correspondences between the 'dream teams' compiled by the newspaper Nemzeti Sport (World Cup 2010 special edition of the newspaper Nemzeti Sport Extra, published on May 11, 20120, page 8, Chief Editor: Sal Endre) and by our robotic expert system. URL2010-06-02 10:39
URUURU With the help of previous attributes our robotic expert has determined the starting 11 of Uruguay. As a mentionable interest, Diego Perez who has played 1062 minutes during the WC qualification was identified as a threat due to the 7 yellow cards received during the time. You can view the starting 11 and the players' order based on their performance by clicking on the URL. URL2010-06-02 09:37
Methodological vade-mecum: Now, when the professional advices (regarding the RSA-MEX match) for the starting elevens are revealed from our own analysis and from other sources, one may ask: Who should I believe to? The answer is simple, but it can not be given at this time. An advisory methodology deserves the attention of the coaches (or the Reader) if the next match clarifies that it is closer to the reality than the other methods. In other words: in the future, we will examine whether it is true or untrue that a team won more matches (or scored more/ received less goals) because the coach built a team more similar to the suggestions of the 'kibitzes'. Based on that examination, it may be stated objectively if there is a significant relationship between the suggested team set-ups, the methods determining those set-ups and success. Y0-style program (model) executions may be different, so in the future, the experts' 'sense of reality' may be measured objectively...n.a.2010-05-30 16:03
MEXMEX Similarly to the results of the previous analysis, the newspaper Nemzeti Sport (World Cup 2010 special edition of the newspaper Nemzeti Sport Extra, published on May 7, 20120, Chief Editor: Sal Endre) and our system would choose different players for playing in the starting eleven of Mexico on the opening game. There are only four correspondences between the starting elevens picked by our robotic expert and by Nemzeti Sport: Ricardo Osorio, Israel Castro, Cuauhtémoc Blanco and Carlos Vela.URL2010-05-28 10:32
MEXMEX Our robotic expert "selected" (with the help of the attributes used for determining the starting 11 of South-Africa) the starting eleven of Mexico, the other protagonist of the opening game of the 19th football World Cup. URL2010-05-28 09:31
RSARSA The 'Nemzeti Sport' (National Sport) (World Cup 2010 National Sport Extra magazine, May 05, 2010., page 6., editor in chief: Sal Endre) would go out with a different starting eleven from the South African selection against Mexico than our robot-expert for the grand opening. Altogether there are only 5 players who match both selections: Aaron Mokoena, Siphiwe Tshabalala, Steven Pienaar, Katlego Mphela, Benni McCarth. URL2010-05-28 09:27
Methodological guide: Each time there is a big match/tournament we can hear who the probable winner on paper is. However, the theory does not succeed all the time (the same way as there are differences between the public-opinion researches during the pre-election and the final result of the election). Therefore, if we make theories with several methods for every previous World Cup, and calculate which method was the most exact for each WC (altogether, respectively the first three places, or only regarding the final winner), then we could learn from the hints/fibs from the past. A result of an analysis like this would be the best approximation of the most authentic method (and so the expected results). The same logic was successfully used in connection with the competition of the meteorological analyses! So there is no need of statistics (survey data) to see clearly...URL2010-05-27 08:25
RSARSA Based on the data available to us about each player, the values of members of national teams may be calculated in regard of their team or position (striker, midfielder, back or goalkeeper). Based on the calculation, the 11 most favorable players may easily be determined. Of course, in the “dream team” calculated this way, the personal and skill-related connections between players / rows are neglected, and this team may not be aligned to different opponents. However, if a coach uses a tactic significantly different from that, then we may consider that to be a tactical message in regard of both the starting eleven and the substitutes (injuries, yellow/red cards and regardless to the threat of all these). The only analysis that has been made so far is about the South-African team, which analysis is an Y0-model, and we assume in this model that all players have equal values, and the algorithm tries to prove that. If the algorithm fails to do so, then the relative/objective advantages of each player compared to the others are unfolded.URL2010-05-27 08:02
RSARSA Ever wondered how important a head coach is on a tournament? The robotic expert formed the starting 11 of South Africa (the organizer country of WC2010) by the following attributes: The number of international matches, The specific players' clubpoints listed by the world ranking list, The number of matches played by each and every player in their own clubs, The ratio of the number of matches played in the club team and the number of rounds in the championship, the number of league matches played by a player, The number of matches played by the player during the World Cup qualification, The number of minutes played during the qualification, The number of goals during the qualification, The number of given yellow cards to each and every player in the course of these matches, The number of sendoffs after the second yellow card, The immediate sendoffs and the corrected values of the latest four attributes with the number of minutes played by each player. n.a.2010-05-27 01:00
The analyses published on this site were made with similarity analysis. More details can be found in the MY-X FREE services: URL2010-05-26 17:25
Welcome! The News-Generator (being able to derivate brand-new news) has started...n.a.2010-05-26 16:58
((Back))
A magyar vŠltozatot a bŲngťszű nyelvi beŠllŪtŠsain keresztŁl ťrheti el, ha a magyar nyelvet ŠllŪtja a legfelsű pozŪciůba!Die deutsche Version kŲnnen Sie dadurch erreichen, wenn Sie im Browser die deutsche Sprache auf die oberste Position stellen!The English version will be provided, if you set English to the top of the list of languages in your browser! // © 2008-2010 My-X (free) // Validated by HTML ValidatorCSS ist valide!The creation of the English version was supported by Babelfish!Public services - supported by MIAŕ (HU ISSN 1419-1652)!