„QuILT-rules” változatai közötti eltérés
A Miau Wiki wikiből
| 2. sor: | 2. sor: | ||
Terms and conditions (offered by teachers, revisions by Students - s also the history behind and the discussions parallel): | Terms and conditions (offered by teachers, revisions by Students - s also the history behind and the discussions parallel): | ||
| − | *... | + | |
| + | *All sources (Internet, books, persons) can always be involved into the problem solving by Students. | ||
| + | *No data/fact should be learned (in the classic way - But: the problem solving is mostly faster, if a big data asset is available in the brain of Students.) | ||
| + | *Good questions can not be answered through simple Google searches. | ||
| + | *Knowledge is, what can be transformed into source code, each other human activity is a kind of artistic activity. | ||
| + | *Students should not only be capable of reflecting the already well-known “knowledge” from the past, but they have to find problems, lacks, risks in the structure of the given net of facts and rules. Therefore: Students should become a better expert as their classic teachers. | ||
| + | *A relevant question is: what is better than an other object? | ||
| + | *The real role of the “teachers” is the role of the coaches. | ||
| + | *The learning/teaching/coaching processes should be as far as possible to produce log-data (e.g. questions and answers should always be collected in a written form). | ||
| + | *The magic of words is not the final form of the description of knowledge. | ||
| + | *It worth knowing about the Academic Writing Skills as far as possible (especially in cases, where relevant messages should be created in form of SMS.) | ||
| + | *The log-based evaluations of performances of the Students will always be public in an anonimyzed way (see: PLA-phase, mid-term dashboards, final evaluation). | ||
| + | *Performances should be benchmarked/compared as far as possible. | ||
| + | *Evaluations should be derived about performances not only by the coaches, but especially by Students about at least 3 further Students. | ||
| + | *Questions should be answered as far as possible in the first case by Students. | ||
| + | *Unprepared declarations from coaches/literature without trial & error effects by Students are to minimize. | ||
A lap 2018. november 23., 14:53-kori változata
QuILT-sitemap: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/QuILT-content
Terms and conditions (offered by teachers, revisions by Students - s also the history behind and the discussions parallel):
- All sources (Internet, books, persons) can always be involved into the problem solving by Students.
- No data/fact should be learned (in the classic way - But: the problem solving is mostly faster, if a big data asset is available in the brain of Students.)
- Good questions can not be answered through simple Google searches.
- Knowledge is, what can be transformed into source code, each other human activity is a kind of artistic activity.
- Students should not only be capable of reflecting the already well-known “knowledge” from the past, but they have to find problems, lacks, risks in the structure of the given net of facts and rules. Therefore: Students should become a better expert as their classic teachers.
- A relevant question is: what is better than an other object?
- The real role of the “teachers” is the role of the coaches.
- The learning/teaching/coaching processes should be as far as possible to produce log-data (e.g. questions and answers should always be collected in a written form).
- The magic of words is not the final form of the description of knowledge.
- It worth knowing about the Academic Writing Skills as far as possible (especially in cases, where relevant messages should be created in form of SMS.)
- The log-based evaluations of performances of the Students will always be public in an anonimyzed way (see: PLA-phase, mid-term dashboards, final evaluation).
- Performances should be benchmarked/compared as far as possible.
- Evaluations should be derived about performances not only by the coaches, but especially by Students about at least 3 further Students.
- Questions should be answered as far as possible in the first case by Students.
- Unprepared declarations from coaches/literature without trial & error effects by Students are to minimize.
