„Vita:QuILT-IK045-Diary” változatai közötti eltérés
A Miau Wiki wikiből
(Új oldal, tartalma: „...”) |
|||
1. sor: | 1. sor: | ||
− | ... | + | =1. Day (2019.II.13)= |
+ | Conclusions after the first meeting: | ||
+ | *the potential/wished chained effect (the connection between two courses based on a single person having both courses behind each other) should be stopped because the single person has a correction in the course registration | ||
+ | *the next task should be a task being capable of catalyzing personal confrontations with operative details because | ||
+ | **on the surface, messages/phenomena seem to be evident | ||
+ | **but the "devil" is in the details | ||
+ | *the next tasks should support to finalize/catalyze already initialized topics like | ||
+ | **creation of evaluation rule sets for arbitrary phenomena (definitions, co-operations, rule sets, etc.) | ||
+ | **creation of re-definition-chains in a successive way demonstrating the potential of the complexity | ||
+ | *the next task should also be capable of | ||
+ | **approximating professional contents (like new keywords parallel to the basic keyword of knowledge) | ||
+ | **deriving temporary winners (e.g. the best definitions and the appropriate rule set ensuring robotized evaluation processes) | ||
+ | *Students should have more time for solutions of the next tasks in order | ||
+ | **to confront with each relevant detail | ||
+ | **but always being supervised by other Students and/or conductors during the whole time for solutions | ||
+ | |||
+ | Remarks: Students should also be more active (c.f. the history of the QuILT system demonstrates what can be seen later in an objective way...) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Remarks: Students could be more active in NEPTUN (through answering email's from the conductors) and/or in MOODLE (creating more definitions and re-definitions in frame of the appropriate forums). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Annexes: | ||
+ | *Demo of rule sets for evaluation of definitions: https://miau.my-x.hu/miau/quilt/OT1c.xlsx | ||
+ | *... | ||
+ | |||
+ | =2. Day (2019.II.20)= | ||
+ | Conclusions after the first meeting: | ||
+ | * |
A lap 2019. február 14., 14:26-kori változata
1. Day (2019.II.13)
Conclusions after the first meeting:
- the potential/wished chained effect (the connection between two courses based on a single person having both courses behind each other) should be stopped because the single person has a correction in the course registration
- the next task should be a task being capable of catalyzing personal confrontations with operative details because
- on the surface, messages/phenomena seem to be evident
- but the "devil" is in the details
- the next tasks should support to finalize/catalyze already initialized topics like
- creation of evaluation rule sets for arbitrary phenomena (definitions, co-operations, rule sets, etc.)
- creation of re-definition-chains in a successive way demonstrating the potential of the complexity
- the next task should also be capable of
- approximating professional contents (like new keywords parallel to the basic keyword of knowledge)
- deriving temporary winners (e.g. the best definitions and the appropriate rule set ensuring robotized evaluation processes)
- Students should have more time for solutions of the next tasks in order
- to confront with each relevant detail
- but always being supervised by other Students and/or conductors during the whole time for solutions
Remarks: Students should also be more active (c.f. the history of the QuILT system demonstrates what can be seen later in an objective way...)
Remarks: Students could be more active in NEPTUN (through answering email's from the conductors) and/or in MOODLE (creating more definitions and re-definitions in frame of the appropriate forums).
Annexes:
- Demo of rule sets for evaluation of definitions: https://miau.my-x.hu/miau/quilt/OT1c.xlsx
- ...
2. Day (2019.II.20)
Conclusions after the first meeting: