„QuILT-IK045-Diary” változatai közötti eltérés
A Miau Wiki wikiből
(→Task Nr.1) |
|||
| 8. sor: | 8. sor: | ||
Remarks: The expected definitions should be appropriate complex/long. Please, do not use any sources neither for the general definition nor for your personal definition! The probability (that all member in the team will create the same definition about the keyword "KNOWLEDGE") is never high. Therefore, the second task-layer about the general definition targets either a definition which could really be created by an other team-member or a definition created/creating by the so called "average people". Example: Please define the word "WATER"! Expert-definition = H2O / General definition (like definitions in Wikipedia) = "Water is a transparent, tasteless, odorless, and nearly colorless chemical substance..." | Remarks: The expected definitions should be appropriate complex/long. Please, do not use any sources neither for the general definition nor for your personal definition! The probability (that all member in the team will create the same definition about the keyword "KNOWLEDGE") is never high. Therefore, the second task-layer about the general definition targets either a definition which could really be created by an other team-member or a definition created/creating by the so called "average people". Example: Please define the word "WATER"! Expert-definition = H2O / General definition (like definitions in Wikipedia) = "Water is a transparent, tasteless, odorless, and nearly colorless chemical substance..." | ||
| − | *T1c: Please, create an evaluation rule set describing how somebody should evaluate/rank the quality of a lot of definitions! | + | *T1c: Please, create an evaluation rule set describing how somebody should evaluate/rank the quality of a lot of definitions (see above)! |
| − | *T1d: Please, create an evaluation rule set describing how somebody should evaluate/rank the quality of a lot of rule sets | + | *T1d: Please, create an evaluation rule set describing how somebody should evaluate/rank the quality of a lot of rule sets (evaluating definitions)! |
| − | *T1e: (...evaluation rule sets can always be expected to each creation level...) | + | *T1e: (unlimited task list: ...evaluation rule sets can always be expected to each creation level...:-) |
A lap 2019. február 8., 10:42-kori változata
QuILT-sitemap: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/QuILT-content
1. Day (2019.02.13.)
Task Nr.1 (T1)
Solutions should be sent to the prepared forum in the Moodle system:
- T1a: Please, create a definition (being valid especially for you) about the keyword "KNOWLEDGE"!
- T1b: Please, create an other definition too (being valid in general or especially for somebody else in the team) about the keyword "KNOWLEDGE"!
Remarks: The expected definitions should be appropriate complex/long. Please, do not use any sources neither for the general definition nor for your personal definition! The probability (that all member in the team will create the same definition about the keyword "KNOWLEDGE") is never high. Therefore, the second task-layer about the general definition targets either a definition which could really be created by an other team-member or a definition created/creating by the so called "average people". Example: Please define the word "WATER"! Expert-definition = H2O / General definition (like definitions in Wikipedia) = "Water is a transparent, tasteless, odorless, and nearly colorless chemical substance..."
- T1c: Please, create an evaluation rule set describing how somebody should evaluate/rank the quality of a lot of definitions (see above)!
- T1d: Please, create an evaluation rule set describing how somebody should evaluate/rank the quality of a lot of rule sets (evaluating definitions)!
- T1e: (unlimited task list: ...evaluation rule sets can always be expected to each creation level...:-)
