A lap 2019. február 14., 13:52-kori változata

1. Day (2019.II.13)

Conclusions after the first meeting:

• the potential/wished chained effect (the connection between two courses based on a little team having both courses) should be stopped because
  • the speed of a small group is faster
  • the reaction of a greater group of Students are partially different
• the next meeting will be hold in a specific room with personal computers in order
  • to ensure the generation of digital finger/foot-prints for each Student
  • to ensure transparency (and therefore quality) for all details during the working together
• the next task should be a task being capable of catalyzing personal confrontations with operative details because
  • on the surface, messages/phenomena seem to be evident
  • but the "devil" is in the details
• the next tasks should support to finalize/catalyze already initialized topics like
  • creation of evaluation rule sets for arbitrary phenomena (definitions, co-operations, rule sets, etc.)
  • creation of re-definition-chains in a successive way demonstrating the potential of the complexity
• the next task should also be capable of
  • approximating professional contents (like new keywords parallel to the basic keyword of knowledge
  • deriving temporary winners (e.g. the best definitions and the appropriate rule set ensuring robotized evaluation processes)
• Students should have more time for solutions of the next tasks in order
  • to confront with each relevant detail
  • but always being supervised by other Students and/or conductors during the whole time for solutions

Remarks: Students should also be more active (c.f. the history of the QuILT system demonstrates what can be seen later in an objective way...)

Remarks: Students could be more active in NEPTUN (through answering email's from the conductors) and/or in MOODLE (creating more definitions and re-definitions in frame of the appropriate forums).

2. Day (2019.II.20)

Conclusions after the first meeting: