„QuILT-1” változatai közötti eltérés

A Miau Wiki wikiből
33. sor: 33. sor:
  
 
S2: All right, Sir, I will be here - and maybe in the further meetings too... :-)
 
S2: All right, Sir, I will be here - and maybe in the further meetings too... :-)
 +
 +
'''T: O.K. - I think, the classmates did not understand maybe detailed enough, what we are speaking about... Did they?
 +
'''
 +
 +
S1: No, I think, I/we did not... Although I read also some WIKI-articles offered through the theater ticket as a kind of invitation letter for this first meeting today...
 +
 +
'''T: All right, then let us go... First of all: we should concentrate to the PLA-test, in order to have a kind of system in out activities. As some of you could already guess: the invitation itself can be seen as the first task, even the first group of sub-tasks in the PLA-test. It was namely to log,
 +
*who used the quasi-anonymity based on the sent username and password?
 +
*who tried to edit some of the wiki-articles offered for playing with them?
 +
*what kind of editing action were made (incl. errors, improvements, etc.)?
 +
*which typing speed can be assumed based on timestamps and the amount of letters?
 +
*who gave reactions to an other Student?
 +
*etc.
 +
'''
 +
 +
S(1, ..., n): What? We produced already a kind of finger print about us?
 +
 +
'''T: Yes, some of you did it! And instead of you, I would ask a lot of positive and negative questions at once: e.g.
 +
In case of mostly positive impressions:
 +
*Would it be possible to rank us based on these finger prints?
 +
*Is somebody good enough to have at once the credits?
 +
In case of mostly negative impressions:
 +
*It should not have given a GDPR-contract before logging data about us?
 +
*Who can see our finger prints at all?
 +
*Who can identify us based on the predefined usernames?
 +
'''

A lap 2018. november 19., 14:53-kori változata

Knowledge Economy

script for all roles with comments from the authors
Legend: T = Teacher, S[i] = one of the Students, R = Robot-RuDu)
elements of screen play: either nothing or masks if a one-man-show should be performed

T: Gooood Morning, Vietnam! (c.f. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Morning,_Vietnam)

S(1, ..., n): Hi, hi, ahoi Mr(s)... What? Vietnam?!

T: Welcome! It is our first meeting, and we need at once to focus on a PLA-test before starting...

S1: Stop-stop-stop! What does PLA stand for?

T: Excellent reaction Mr(s)...

S1: And, and, and: why did you speak about Vietnam here?

T: Also a good question! Thank you! May I answer them?

S1: Yeah, of course...

T: All right: The abbreviation PLA does stand for Prior Learning Assessment - and PLA is important both for you and for me. For you it is important because a few Students want surely to have the credit of this course with a very efficient workload. The most efficient way is, if I know about your characteristics. In an extreme case: I can give somebody at once the needed credits after successful closing/evaluating the PLA-test. Who is interested the have credits within a week?

S2: I think, it would be nice for me - I hope, to understand enough the new, digital world, the knowledge economy as such. Yeah, and thank you for the theater ticket! I read each chained articles in your QuILT-system. Impressive, very impressive Mr(s)... And before I do forget: I could find out an old username and password for your MIAU-WIKI - and I think, you could already see, what I did there... :-)

T: Yes, I did! :-) And I did not write to you - because: I hoped, I will come today to the class... And you will support the introduction process for the other Students - like you did start it... :-)

S2: All right, Sir, I will be here - and maybe in the further meetings too... :-)

T: O.K. - I think, the classmates did not understand maybe detailed enough, what we are speaking about... Did they?

S1: No, I think, I/we did not... Although I read also some WIKI-articles offered through the theater ticket as a kind of invitation letter for this first meeting today...

T: All right, then let us go... First of all: we should concentrate to the PLA-test, in order to have a kind of system in out activities. As some of you could already guess: the invitation itself can be seen as the first task, even the first group of sub-tasks in the PLA-test. It was namely to log,

  • who used the quasi-anonymity based on the sent username and password?
  • who tried to edit some of the wiki-articles offered for playing with them?
  • what kind of editing action were made (incl. errors, improvements, etc.)?
  • which typing speed can be assumed based on timestamps and the amount of letters?
  • who gave reactions to an other Student?
  • etc.

S(1, ..., n): What? We produced already a kind of finger print about us?

T: Yes, some of you did it! And instead of you, I would ask a lot of positive and negative questions at once: e.g. In case of mostly positive impressions:

  • Would it be possible to rank us based on these finger prints?
  • Is somebody good enough to have at once the credits?

In case of mostly negative impressions:

  • It should not have given a GDPR-contract before logging data about us?
  • Who can see our finger prints at all?
  • Who can identify us based on the predefined usernames?