QuILT-IK045-Diary

QuILT-sitemap: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/QuILT-content

1. Day (2019.02.13.)

Obligatory Task Nr.1 (OT1a-b-c-d)

Solutions should always be sent to the prepared forum in the Moodle system or in case of system error - each solution should be written down on a sheet of paper - as far as possible with block capitals (uppercase):

• OT1a: Please, create a definition (being valid especially for you) about the keyword "KNOWLEDGE"!
• OT1b: Please, create an other definition too (being valid in general or especially for somebody else in the team) about the keyword "KNOWLEDGE"!

Remarks for supporting operative interpretations: The expected definitions should be appropriate complex/long. Please, do not use any sources neither for the general definition nor for your personal definition! The probability (that all member in the team will create the same definition about the keyword "KNOWLEDGE") is never high. Therefore, the second task-layer about the general definition targets either a definition which could really be created by an other team-member or a definition created/creating by the so called "average people". Example: Please define the word "WATER"! Expert-definition = H2O / General definition (like definitions in Wikipedia) = "Water is a transparent, tasteless, odorless, and nearly colorless chemical substance..."

• OT1c: Please, create an evaluation rule set describing how somebody should evaluate/rank the quality of a lot of definitions (see above)!
• OT1d: Please, create an evaluation rule set describing how somebody should evaluate/rank the quality of a lot of rule sets (evaluating definitions)!
• [FT0*: (unlimited task list: ...evaluation rule sets can always be expected to each creation level...:-) ]

Remarks for supporting operative interpretations: Without being capable of defining the term of the "Ideal/Good/Best/Target" and also the distance of solutions compared to these benchmarks or without being capable of deriving what objects are better than other ones, nobody can speak about rational planning/thinking/doing...

Remarks about didactic aspects: Without being capable of measuring the starting positions of Students, we can never speak about "learning/teaching" success - therefore in case of each task, the basic statements of each Student are always necessary to collect. 

Facultative Task (FT_*)

The following tasks need probably more time than available. But they could also be seen as relevant extensions in order to have a complex system of points of views supporting parallel divergent/convergent learning/teaching/problem-solving strategies:

• Each definition (see OT1a, OT1b) should be evaluated in an instinctive way by at least 2-3 (or all) Students before OT1c and OT1d will be published at all...
• Students should try to create a common definition based on the created definition (see OT1a and OT1b)...
• Students should try to derive a methodology describing how a lot of definitions with totally different quality can be joined to a common definition being valid for each Student (created one or more definitions before)...
• Each rule set (see OT1c, OT1d) should be evaluated in an instinctive way by at least 2-3 (or all) Students...
• Students should try to create a common rule set based on the created rule set evaluating definitions (see OT1*)...
• Students should try to derive a methodology describing how a lot of rule sets with totally different quality can be joined to a common rule set being valid for each Student (created one or more rule sets before)...
• ...

Remarks: Without practical experiences about operative doing/handling in a given task, Students mostly remains Prisoners in the world of the magic of words where flexible terms can be created and used for covering massive lacks of experiences on the proved/observed fields...