QuILT 2DM

Treasure hunting

If you have already read this wiki-site (https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/QuILT_3747) then you are on the right place! :-)

• Thank you for sending your CV (Task Nr.2)

• Task Nr.3:
  • Please, visit the following URL: https://miau.my-x.hu/miau/253/2dm/
  • Please, play at least one lap with possibly each 2DM-game!
  • Please, try to derive the logic behind the games!
  • You will find a so-called empty-game (see: https://miau.my-x.hu/miau/quilt/2020/empty_game_2dm.png)
  • Please, identify a public document (e.g. a professional book, script, article, study, etc.) in English being useful for creating your own game!

Important notice: The new game should have a clear target-group with clear utility/benefit/usefulness/advantage for the users!

• • For creating a new game, it is necessary to be capable of defining the following elements:
    • Detailed description of the targeted groups with detailed argumentation and detailed demonstration of advantages (the objectives of the game)
    • the exact URL of the basic/public documentation (which your game is built on)
    • 3 pictures (PNG) for row-header-positions
    • 3 pictures (PNG) for column-header-positions
    • 9 pictures (PNG) for moving answer-cards (on the right side)

• • Please, create a documentation (PDF) about your game-parameters where
    • each picture is inserted
    • it is necessary to present a rule-like quote/citation for each answer-card (9)
    • you describe the correctness of the header positions (3+3)

Worth knowing: The best documentation leads at once to the realization of the planned credits of the course!
BUT how can we objectively identify the best documentation among the alternative ones?

• • OAM-description for an objective evaluation of the planned games (where OAM does stand for Object-Attribute-Matrix):
    • objects = documentations of the games (one Student can send more documentations=objects)
    • attributes = evaluation criteria (defined by the conductor here and now):
      • the earlier is the submission of the description the better is the object (see timestamp of the email)
      • the more voluminous is the targeted group the better is the object (c.f. Google Trends)
      • the higher is the usefulness of the game for the targeted groups the better is the object (c.f. Google Trends)
      • the more exact/detailed are the quotes (proves) the better is the object (c.f. Robot-English-Test: https://miau.my-x.hu/miau/246/Responsibility.docx)
      • the higher is the object's average subjective evaluation value (from the other Students) the better is the object
      • the higher is the amount of relevant basic/public documents (knowledge supply) the better is the object (c.f. Google Search results)
      • the higher is the amount of Internet-sites about problems (knowledge demand / need) in the field of the affected topic/problem the better is the object (see e.g. forums)

Specific task for credit realization: Creating a new attribute-list and executing/documenting of the whole evaluation process!
Specific task for credit realization: Evaluating alternative attribute-lists (incl. creating an attribute-list for evaluation of attribute-lists) and executing/documenting of the whole evaluation process (assumed that a lot of alternative will be defined by the conductor)...