„QuILT” változatai közötti eltérés

A Miau Wiki wikiből
(General information)
16. sor: 16. sor:
 
**then: Students can criticize the offered patterns, rules, terms and conditions,
 
**then: Students can criticize the offered patterns, rules, terms and conditions,
 
**but: each critical manifestation should have a massive part of argumentation, alternative solutions and the evaluations all of them
 
**but: each critical manifestation should have a massive part of argumentation, alternative solutions and the evaluations all of them
*Ideals will be legitimated through big data and artificial intelligence based evaluations: it means, through PLAN-FACT comparisons
+
*Ideals will be legitimated through big data and artificial intelligence based evaluations: it means, through PLAN-FACT comparisons.
  
MOTTO (Knuth, 1992, Stanford):
+
MOTTO (Knuth, 1992, Stanford): "Science is what we understand well enough to explain to a computer. Art is everything else we do."
 +
 
 +
Why: THEATRE
 +
 
 +
*The frontal teaching is not interactive enough,
 +
*but the realization of a real interactivity needs a lot of preparation works.
 +
 
 +
QuILT try to entertain all. However, nothing is free of charge. Everybody have to pay. At first: PAY ATTENTION!

A lap 2018. november 19., 11:57-kori változata

Quilt.png

General information

This information unit can be seen by each affected person (like Student, teacher, actor, actress, partner, etc.) before starting the first presentation/performance. Therefore, this information unit is a kind of textual trailer...

Ars virtualica:

  • The QuILT as a conception will become a movement - step by step.
  • The QuILT is going to support processes, where Students and teachers could face with potential and individual ideals.
  • A teacher is rather a mentor,
    • who makes possible to identify a lot of point of views without any enforced statements, declarations -
    • without the hoped position having the very truth.
  • However, individual/customized ideals need a lot of responsibilities both from teachers and Students.
  • To achieve a rational level of interactivity between Students, teachers and the both parties can be seen as a step-wise project:
    • first: Students will be confronted with potential ideals concerning behavior patterns in knowledge transfer processes (like learning, teaching).
    • then: Students can criticize the offered patterns, rules, terms and conditions,
    • but: each critical manifestation should have a massive part of argumentation, alternative solutions and the evaluations all of them
  • Ideals will be legitimated through big data and artificial intelligence based evaluations: it means, through PLAN-FACT comparisons.
MOTTO (Knuth, 1992, Stanford): "Science is what we understand well enough to explain to a computer. Art is everything else we do."

Why: THEATRE

  • The frontal teaching is not interactive enough,
  • but the realization of a real interactivity needs a lot of preparation works.
QuILT try to entertain all. However, nothing is free of charge. Everybody have to pay. At first: PAY ATTENTION!