„QuILT” változatai közötti eltérés

A Miau Wiki wikiből
(General information)
3. sor: 3. sor:
  
 
  This information unit can be seen by each affected person (like Student, teacher, actor, actress, partner, etc.) before starting the first presentation/performance. Therefore, this information unit is a kind of textual trailer...
 
  This information unit can be seen by each affected person (like Student, teacher, actor, actress, partner, etc.) before starting the first presentation/performance. Therefore, this information unit is a kind of textual trailer...
 +
[[Fájl:quilt_ticket.png]]
  
 
Ars virtualica:
 
Ars virtualica:

A lap 2018. november 19., 13:08-kori változata

Quilt.png

General information

This information unit can be seen by each affected person (like Student, teacher, actor, actress, partner, etc.) before starting the first presentation/performance. Therefore, this information unit is a kind of textual trailer...

Quilt ticket.png

Ars virtualica:

  • The QuILT as a conception should/will become a movement - step by step.
  • The QuILT is going to support processes, where Students and teachers could face with potential and individual ideals.
  • A teacher is rather a mentor,
    • who makes possible to identify a lot of point of views without any enforced statements, declarations -
    • without the hoped position having the very truth.
  • However, individual/customized ideals need a lot of responsibilities both from teachers and Students.
  • To achieve a rational level of interactivity between Students, teachers and the both parties can be seen as a step-wise project:
    • first: Students will be confronted with potential ideals concerning behavior patterns in knowledge transfer processes (like learning, teaching).
    • then: Students can criticize the offered patterns, rules, terms and conditions,
    • but: each critical manifestation should have a massive part of argumentation, alternative solutions and the evaluations all of them
  • Ideals will be legitimated through big data and artificial intelligence based evaluations: it means, through PLAN-FACT comparisons.
MOTTO (Knuth, 1992, Stanford): "Science is what we understand well enough to explain to a computer. Art is everything else we do."

Why: THEATER?

  • The frontal teaching is not interactive enough,
  • but the realization of a real interactivity needs a lot of preparation works.
  • Classic theater performances are capable synchronizing thinking methods.
    • The first performances will be written by teachers and presented by actors, actresses, teachers.
    • In the second phase, story boards/screen plays/scripts will be created by Students, and presented by the teaching staff.
    • In the next phase, the whole performance will be made by a group of Students.
    • Later, the scripts created by a group of Students can be performed by an other group of Students.
  • So, a development of the interactivity can be realized step by step.
QuILT tries to entertain all. However, nothing is free of charge. Everybody has to pay. At first: PAY ATTENTION!

Why: LEARNING?

  • The offered patterns concerning potential ideal behaviors should be catalyze reaction by Students and also by teachers - as a kind of chained effect...
  • Learning by doing and doing by learning can be merged through the gamification frames.
  • Parallel, real performances (like learning materials) will be worked out through common legitimated games.
  • As practical knowledge may be seen each experiences having direct connections to the real life of Students.
  • Theoretical is a knowledge, if a direct connection to the Student's reality is not given.
  • What is more direct for a Student then a learning process as such.
  • First of all, QuILT will work with phenomena like KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, where technical (ICT) and human aspect can and should be be merged.
  • QuILT is - therefore - a kind of general course for thinking methodology (or development of personality or support for self-identified learning methodologies).

Why: INTERACTIVITY

  • Log-based evaluation of performances can only be made if log-data are given.
  • Just activities can be logged (if EEG-s are still not involved into the monitoring system).
  • Hearing and seeing/watching are less relevant as doing/creating.
  • Activities can be constructive (like extensions, adaptations, substitutions, etc.) and destructive (c.f. exploring critical aspects).

Why: QUASI

  • Interactivity can also be dangerous (it means: less effective or efficient, than declaration-based processes), if nobody is able to canalize efforts.
  • Offered ideals are just potentials.
  • Human intuitions are very important, but not always excellent.
  • There seems to be not a final truth, but a lot of way leading to a higher level of thinking complexity.