„QuILT” változatai közötti eltérés
A Miau Wiki wikiből
1. sor: | 1. sor: | ||
[[Fájl:quilt.png]] | [[Fájl:quilt.png]] | ||
− | =QuILT: | + | =General information= |
+ | |||
+ | This information unit can be seen by each affected person (like Student, teacher, actor, actress, partner, etc.) before starting the first presentation/performance. Therefore, this information unit is a kind of textual trailer... | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ars virtualica: | ||
+ | |||
+ | *The QuILT as a conception will become a movement - step by step. | ||
+ | *The QuILT is going to support processes, where Students and teachers could face with potential and individual ideals. | ||
+ | *A teacher is rather a mentor, | ||
+ | **who makes possible to identify a lot of point of views without any enforced statements, declarations - | ||
+ | **without the hoped position having the very truth. | ||
+ | *However, individual/customized ideals need a lot of responsibilities both from teachers and Students. | ||
+ | *To achieve a rational level of interactivity between Students, teachers and the both parties can be seen as a step-wise project: | ||
+ | **first: Students will be confronted with potential ideals concerning behavior patterns in knowledge transfer processes (like learning, teaching). | ||
+ | **then: Students can criticize the offered patterns, rules, terms and conditions, | ||
+ | **but: each critical manifestation should have a massive part of argumentation, alternative solutions and the evaluations all of them | ||
+ | *Ideals will be legitimated through big data and artificial intelligence based evaluations: it means, through PLAN-FACT comparisons | ||
+ | |||
+ | MOTTO (Knuth, 1992, Stanford): |
A lap 2018. november 19., 11:52-kori változata
General information
This information unit can be seen by each affected person (like Student, teacher, actor, actress, partner, etc.) before starting the first presentation/performance. Therefore, this information unit is a kind of textual trailer...
Ars virtualica:
- The QuILT as a conception will become a movement - step by step.
- The QuILT is going to support processes, where Students and teachers could face with potential and individual ideals.
- A teacher is rather a mentor,
- who makes possible to identify a lot of point of views without any enforced statements, declarations -
- without the hoped position having the very truth.
- However, individual/customized ideals need a lot of responsibilities both from teachers and Students.
- To achieve a rational level of interactivity between Students, teachers and the both parties can be seen as a step-wise project:
- first: Students will be confronted with potential ideals concerning behavior patterns in knowledge transfer processes (like learning, teaching).
- then: Students can criticize the offered patterns, rules, terms and conditions,
- but: each critical manifestation should have a massive part of argumentation, alternative solutions and the evaluations all of them
- Ideals will be legitimated through big data and artificial intelligence based evaluations: it means, through PLAN-FACT comparisons
MOTTO (Knuth, 1992, Stanford):