QuILT-PLA1

QuILT-sitemap: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/QuILT-content

Questions/task based on the animation about knowledge economy

Part A

Please, open the following animation about knowledge economy! (Everybody can it make in an individual way, and the watching should not be sequential.) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFQKE5UMbt8 (Duration: ca. 6 minutes – result: watching/hearing) - (the downloaded version can be reached on the common server: https://miau.my-x.hu/miau/quilt/)

Please, search for lacks in the (spoken) argumentation chains of the animation – during the watching!

Please, formulate an SMS (max. 160 characters) about the main message of the animation! (ca. 2 minutes – result: 1 SMS)

Please, choose the best SMS below describing the main message of the animation and derive the necessary argumentation! (ca. 2 minutes - result: an ID from 1 to 12)

Please, make arguments: Why any other SMS is not ideal?! (ca. 5 minutes - results: 11 further argumentation)

1. The experts (the sources of knowledge) should always be involved into the sharing of benefits realized by investors in the future!
2. The experts (the sources of knowledge) should be involved as far as possible into the sharing of benefits realized by investors in the future.
3. Investors should always use each expertise!
4. Each expertise brings always unexpected benefits.
5. The benefits of an expertise being just realizable in the future, are always prompt derivable during the advising process.
6. Knowledge can always be measured exactly, even therefore everybody can pay for it in a rational way.
7. Knowledge is, what can be measured. <-- The declaration seems to be true, but its origin is not in the animation in a direct way.
8. Knowledge is, what can be transformed into source codes, each other human activities are artistic performances. <-- The declaration seems to be true, but its origin is not in the animation in a direct way.
9. Artistic performances are rather services than a kind of knowledge transfer. <-- The declaration seems to be true, but its origin is not in the animation in a direct way.
10. In case of artistic performances by humans, knowledge will not be transferred. <-- The declaration seems to be true, but its origin is not in the animation in a direct way.
11. Texts are fuzzy source codes. <-- The declaration seems to be true, but its origin is not in the animation in a direct way.
12. Materialized structures, and/or constructions from materials are a specific form of source codes. <-- The declaration seems to be true, but its origin is not in the animation in a direct way.

Part B

• ...

Basic parameters of this task

• basic characteristics: PLA-task
• status: chained task
  • linear chained: 0 %
  • complex chained: 100 %
• impact: open task (with catalytic impacts: e.g exploring alternative solutions, parallel interpretations)
• complete duration: ca. 80 minutes
  • inputs from teachers: 50%
  • own works of Students: 50%
• type of the activity: increasing the potential of souverain/critical thinking in case of literature and concerning the offers of the teachers
• media-elements: mp4, mp3, texts
• cultural elements:
  • Hungarian effects: fables
  • European elements: ancient proverbs
  • Intercultural effects: similar fables/proverbs from other cultures and/or new fables with appropriate contents (as a kind of task for Students)
• critical potential:
  • animation/pictures can be evaluated in form of classic and optimized SWOT analyses
  • lacks in logical chains can be derived by Students
  • analogies - it can be searched for by Studentes
• rights: each element is free for further involving
• technical frame: MIAU-WIKI (QuILT-WIKI)
• ...

Everybody may offer new description layers and/or fine tune the above mentioned initial interpretations!