„Vita:CT 00” változatai közötti eltérés
Jkv1 (vitalap | szerkesztései) (→Chapter#2. Literature) |
Jkv1 (vitalap | szerkesztései) (→Chapter#.8.2. Figures) |
||
70. sor: | 70. sor: | ||
==Chapter#.8.1. Abbreviations== | ==Chapter#.8.1. Abbreviations== | ||
==Chapter#.8.2. Figures== | ==Chapter#.8.2. Figures== | ||
− | Each publication must consist at least one figure from the | + | Each publication must consist at least one figure from the literature and at least one own figure. |
+ | |||
+ | It is required to include full bibliographic data and licensing details for all image sources, especially those taken from external literature, to ensure proper attribution and maintain academic integrity. Visual elements such as charts and tables should be designed for maximum readability and clarity (incl. units). Each visual aid must include: A clear caption describing its content, Visible and labeled axes, columns, or rows, readable text and elements (e.g., font size, colors, line thickness), and proper spacing and contrast to ensure all data is distinguishable. | ||
==Chapter#.8.3. References== | ==Chapter#.8.3. References== |
A lap 2025. április 19., 19:41-kori változata
This discussion page helps to interpret what should be done in a particular chapter and why... Final product: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/CT_00 History of the final product: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php?title=CT_00&action=history History of the discussion page: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php?title=Vita:CT_00&action=history
Tartalomjegyzék
Title
Optimization challenge: the better is a title the more is the number of keywords but the less is the length of the text
Subtitle
(a new aspect can be visualized based on the same principle as before in case of the title)
Authors
names (https://orcid.org/...),
Institutions
expected cover-sheet-elements incl. university, department, etc.
Abstract
One-pager-like chapter for conferences (c.f. IKSAD/Türkiye: https://miau.my-x.hu/miau2009/index_en.php3?x=e080). The abstract is not the summary, where citations might quasi only be listed about the most relevant statements of the publication. The abstract should deliver a kind of motivating information package - quasi without any citations: e.g. history of the project, descriptive core information about the problem, own steps and their results, future - maximal one single page.
Chapter#1. Introduction
Between to chapters (e.g. 1. and 1.1.), it is necessary to have explaining texts - mostly about a kind of detailed/specific table of content with argumentations...
Chapter#1.1. Aims/objectives
A final thesis (a publication in general) might not formulate more aims than being really covered through the publication. In order to avoide the suspicions about potential realistic, but not realized aims/objectives, each promise should have a "CHAPTER#..."-sign, where the Readers will be capable of checking the real performaces behind each promise - immediately. These chapter#-signs can be empty, if the whole structure (table of content) is still fluid. But each empty sing should be filled with the appropriate numbers, if the details behind a promise could be formulated as a finally existing subchapter (mostly in chapter#3 - own development).
The aims may only be listed, if the basic definitions are given. The keywords of the (sub)title and each further relevant term should always and immediately be defined after the first using.
It is not forbidden to work with arbitrary high complexity. In this case: the Readers have to understand the XLSX-files before going on...
Important and general rule: if a plural form is used, then it is necessary to present examples: e.g. phylosophycal challenges (e.g. automation, nature/level of vierification), or arbitrary systems (c.f. encryption/decryption tasks for unknown-cyphers) or relevant keywords ... (c.f. concepts, verification, partial log-data) or different steps (task1, task2, task3, task4:interpretation of the hidden file), etc.
Recommended literature about keyhole-challenges: https://miau.my-x.hu/myx-free/index_en.php3?x=fbl, https://miau.my-x.hu/myx-free/index_en.php3?x=iq
Chapter#1.2. Tasks
Rules: The list of the particular tasks should deliver a clear classification of steps without any overlapping effects and/or without any lacks. BTW: this expectation is valid for each lists in general. Tasks are also promises (as aims/objectives), therefore, it is also necessary to have a chapter#-sign for each task. Tasks are decisions of the Author(s), therefore, it is necessary to deliver argumentations for the rationality of these decisions.
Chapter#1.3. Targeted groups
Rules: each potential targeted groups should be listed (see without overlapping and lacks) - and the argumentations must be given: why is a listed element rational? Targeted groups are potential customers, who should be capable of paying for the results of this project based on a real information added-value estimated by the Authors themselfes.
Chapter#1.4. Utilities (estimation of informational added-values)
Rules: For each targeted group should be made an as far as exact estimation in USD or EUR about the information added-value. It is expected, that the estimations are positive values! Negative values means: parasitism through the IT-experts concerning their customers! Estimations have two layers: incomes and costs in the bechmark situation AND incomes and costs based on the results of the projects.
Chapter#1.5. Motivation
Quasi arbitrary argumentation (in dependence with targeted groups AND informational added-values)...
Chapter#1.6. About the structure of the publication
In this subchapter, it is necessary to write about ALL aspects which will only be mentioned but without deep details.
In this subchapter, it is also necessary to clarify ALL the used formats.
In this subchapter, the structure of the publication must be defined in advance.
Chapter#2. Literature
Between two chapter-titles, it is necessary to have explanations about the structure of the particular subchapters.
This chapter is dedicated for all definitions, which are necessary to understand the own development, results. It is forbidden to have subchapters without any citation(s). Here, it is important to use citations with sources. Between two citations, it is expected, that the Author(s) deliver(s) argumentations about each citation: is a citation is to integrated or even to avoid? More precisely: each citation should be evaluated by the Author(s): either in a positive way (the particural statement of the citation will be integrated: chapter#... or in a negative way: the particural statement of the citation is to avoide).
Chapter#2.1. ...
Chapter#2.2. ...
Chapter#2.3. ...
Chapter#2.4. ...
Chapter#2.5. ...
Chapter#2.6. ...
Chapter#2.7. ...
Chapter#3. Own developments
The presentation of the own developments, experiments, idea, etc. must strict use the keywords inroduced (mostly based on citations, but also in form of own interpretation to the definition in the literature in chapter#2.
Chapter#4. Discussions
Chapter#5. Conclusions
Chapter#6. Future
Chapter#7. Summary
Chapter#8. Annexes
Chapter#.8.1. Abbreviations
Chapter#.8.2. Figures
Each publication must consist at least one figure from the literature and at least one own figure.
It is required to include full bibliographic data and licensing details for all image sources, especially those taken from external literature, to ensure proper attribution and maintain academic integrity. Visual elements such as charts and tables should be designed for maximum readability and clarity (incl. units). Each visual aid must include: A clear caption describing its content, Visible and labeled axes, columns, or rows, readable text and elements (e.g., font size, colors, line thickness), and proper spacing and contrast to ensure all data is distinguishable.
Chapter#.8.3. References
https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/BPROF_Thesis_Structure / https://miau.my-x.hu/bprof/Deepl%20-%20Thesis%20specialities%20of%20the%20BPROF%20training%20at%20the%20KJE.docx / https://miau.my-x.hu/temp/2025tavasz/?C=M;O=D
Chapter#.8.4. Conversations with LLMs
Each publication must have at least one chapter, where relevant information units come from ChatGPT/Copilot (e.g. potential keywords, definitions, etc.). The entire conversations (prompts+ouputs) must be presented in the annex and the used details (citation) must be evaluated mostly in chapter#2.