QuILT offers
A Miau Wiki wikiből
A lap korábbi változatát látod, amilyen Pitlik (vitalap | szerkesztései) 2019. január 25., 16:10-kor történt szerkesztése után volt. (→General conditions for offers)
QuILT-sitemap: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/QuILT-content
Tartalomjegyzék
General conditions for offers
- Unlimited offers can be published in arbitrary constructions and time.
- Offers should support customization of learning parameters.
- Offer-driven learning is preferred contrary to basic version of credit realization.
- Offers can also be initiated by Students.
- Initiated ideas should also be evaluated by at least 3 further Students.
- Evaluation means: How can be identified connections to the QuILT-system?
- Offers can be accepted (c.f. contract) and rejected in case of the given conditions (see offer's constraints).
- Rejected offers can also be chosen at any time (c.f. last minute construction in QuILT).
Offers for credits
Students can choose from the following constructions
Basic version
- Description: Reactive Learning (see basic rules below)
- Valid: for all
- Registration time: unlimited
- Permission: not needed
- Contract:
- general conditions (see basic rules of the semester: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/QuILT-targeted-groups)
- rejecting: not relevant
- Rules (abstract):
- Participation on the course (it is not relevant whether on the spot or online)
- Producing logged activities in the QuILT-system
- Evaluation of logs by other Students and Conductors
1a offer
- Description: Publication-driven Learning I.
- Valid: for "early birds" (it means: 1 or 2 groups with maximal 3 persons)
- Registration time: during the 1. meeting
- Permission: if contracting at once
- Contract: specific conditions (see below)
- Title of the planned publication: .....
- Chapters and their single! authors of the planned publication: .....
- Volume of the chapters: .... characters
- Objectives of the publication (e.g. learning material, knowledge transfer, research, data-visualization, etc.): .....
- Constraints:
- Rejecting: At least an abstract should be presented to have the possibility choosing a new offer (without closing the publication)
- In advance, a decision should be made about the particular authors - especially: conductors may become authors or they are excluded per definitionem?
- Just such a kind of publication can be realized in frame of this offer which may be published after closing the work at once in the e-journal MIAU (HU ISSN: 1419-1652 - https://miau.my-x.hu) or the publication will be submitted to an other editorial board.
- Rules:
- basic recommendations for a 'good' article: https://miau.my-x.hu/myx-free/index.php3?x=test1 (please, use automatic translation services - note: javascript text-panels will not be translated)
- further recommendations: Academic Writing Skills (e.g. https://www.google.com/search?q=academic+writing+skills+online+course)
- interpretation QuILT-rules: https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php/QuILT-literature
- parallel, at least 3 evaluation/test-reports from other Students should also be reached in about the last variant of the publication.
- publication success (particular version) should be reported to the conductors every day.
- conductor's recommendations should be integrated into the publication day by day.
- Titles are preferred where the keywords are part of QuILT courses.
1b offer
- Description: Publication-driven Learning II.
- Valid: for "early birds" (it means: 2 persons alone or in group)
- Registration time: during the 1. meeting
- Permission: if contracting at once
- Contract: specific conditions (see below)
- Task: Correct translation of the test = https://miau.my-x.hu/myx-free/index.php3?x=test1 (please, use automatic translation services - note: javascript text-panels will not be translated)
- Format: New MIAU-WIKI-article
- Constraints:
- Rejecting: At least the automatic translation should be completed before choosing a new offer
- Text-panels in the javascript should also be translated
- Logical structure should be followed
- Rules:
- The static article should be designed so that the interpretation of the logic of the dynamic test can be understood in an easy way.
- Professional HTML-experts may also use HTML-tags like 'table' for structuring content units.
- Parallel, at least 3 evaluation/test-reports from other Students should also be reached in about the last variant of the translation.
Everybody may offer new suggestions for offers and/or fine tune the above mentioned initial interpretations!