„Vita:QuILT-IK059-Diary” változatai közötti eltérés

A Miau Wiki wikiből
(→‎2. Day (2019.II.20))
73. sor: 73. sor:
 
**positive remarks in form of questions: https://miau.my-x.hu/miau/quilt/demo_questions_to_important_messages.docx
 
**positive remarks in form of questions: https://miau.my-x.hu/miau/quilt/demo_questions_to_important_messages.docx
 
**negative remarks (see critics above): with arguments and detailed improvements at once
 
**negative remarks (see critics above): with arguments and detailed improvements at once
 +
 +
 +
=3. Day (2019.II.27)=
 +
 +
Conclusions after the 3. meeting
 +
 +
*Central task of the meeting: 1. Test
 +
*Problems:
 +
**Following File-Name-Conversion
 +
***Not all file name is rule-oriented
 +
***The most file name contain the needed NEPTUN-ID
 +
***Not all file name contain the needed standard part (e.g. course_id)
 +
**Is more instruction and/or common examples are really needed in order to fill the test sheet?
 +
***Without more instructions, the test could also measure a kind of sovereignty
 +
***There were real instructions available
 +
**Quotes are not always quotes (it means: there are a lot of seemingly cited text versions from other sources as expected)
 +
**Not each Student has equipment for teleworking - it means: the whole meeting is needed for a test
 +
**Not each Student has possibilities for 
 +
 +
*Preview of the evaluation robot about Students and Conductors:
 +
**https://miau.my-x.hu/miau/quilt/log_students.xlsx
 +
**https://miau.my-x.hu/miau/quilt/log_conductors.xlsx
 +
 +
 +
*First demo about interpretation possibilities from conductor:
 +
**https://miau.my-x.hu/miau/quilt/st1_all.docx
 +
**all further tests will be commented cell by cell
 +
**and also according to typical phenomena
 +
 +
=4. Day (2019.III.06)=
 +
 +
Conclusions after the 3. meeting

A lap 2019. február 28., 18:38-kori változata

1. Day (2019.II.13)

Conclusions after the first meeting:

  • the potential/wished chained effect (the connection between two courses based on a little team having both courses) should be stopped because
    • the speed of a small group is faster
    • the reaction of a greater group of Students are partially different
  • the next meeting will be hold in a specific room with personal computers in order
    • to ensure the generation of digital finger/foot-prints for each Student
    • to ensure transparency (and therefore quality) for all details during the working together
  • the next task should be a task being capable of catalyzing personal confrontations with operative details because
    • on the surface, messages/phenomena seem to be evident
    • but the "devil" is in the details
  • the next tasks should support to finalize/catalyze already initialized topics like
    • creation of evaluation rule sets for arbitrary phenomena (definitions, co-operations, rule sets, etc.)
    • creation of re-definition-chains in a successive way demonstrating the potential of the complexity
  • the next task should also be capable of
    • approximating professional contents (like new keywords parallel to the basic keyword of knowledge)
    • deriving temporary winners (e.g. the best definitions and the appropriate rule set ensuring robotized evaluation processes)
  • Students should have more time for solutions of the next tasks in order
    • to confront with each relevant detail
    • but always being supervised by other Students and/or conductors during the whole time for solutions
Remarks: Students should also be more active (c.f. the history of the QuILT system demonstrates what can be seen later in an objective way...)

Remarks: Students could be more active in NEPTUN (through answering email's from the conductors) and/or in MOODLE (creating more definitions and re-definitions in frame of the appropriate forums).

Annexes:

  • Demo of rule sets for evaluation of definitions: https://miau.my-x.hu/miau/quilt/OT1c.xlsx
    • Facultative tasks:
    • What kind of additional information can be identified in the file compared to the information during the first meeting?
    • Why are the information units relevant?
  • Defintions of knowledge: https://miau.my-x.hu/miau/quilt/OT1a.docx
    • (each version will be analyzed in a separate way and in connection to each other)
    • (the results will be published as a kind of learning material)


2. Day (2019.II.20)

Conclusions after the second meeting: 

Important questions: Why should we have definitions at all? Where should we use definitions at all? 
(An already known question: Which definition is better than an other definition?)


3. Day (2019.II.27)

Conclusions after the 3. meeting

  • Central task of the meeting: 1. Test
  • Problems:
    • Following File-Name-Conversion
      • Not all file name is rule-oriented
      • The most file name contain the needed NEPTUN-ID
      • Not all file name contain the needed standard part (e.g. course_id)
    • Is more instruction and/or common examples are really needed in order to fill the test sheet?
      • Without more instructions, the test could also measure a kind of sovereignty
      • There were real instructions available
    • Quotes are not always quotes (it means: there are a lot of seemingly cited text versions from other sources as expected)
    • Not each Student has equipment for teleworking - it means: the whole meeting is needed for a test
    • Not each Student has possibilities for


4. Day (2019.III.06)

Conclusions after the 3. meeting

A lap eredeti címe: „https://miau.my-x.hu/mediawiki/index.php?title=Vita:QuILT-IK059-Diary&oldid=79914”